Literature DB >> 1908215

Legal myths about terminating life support.

A Meisel1.   

Abstract

There are a number of myths about what the law permits concerning the termination of life support, some of which spring from a fundamental misconception of what law is. A serious misunderstanding of the law can lead to tragic results for physicians, health care institutions, patients, and families. These misunderstandings are (1) anything that is not specifically permitted by law is prohibited; (2) termination of life support is murder or suicide; (3) a patient must be terminally ill for life support to be stopped; (4) it is permissible to terminate extraordinary treatments, but not ordinary ones; (5) it is permissible to withhold treatment, but once started, it must be continued; (6) stopping tube feeding is legally different from stopping other treatments; (7) termination of life support requires going to court; and (8) living wills are not legal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1908215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  7 in total

1.  'End-of-life' decision making within intensive care--objective, consistent, defensible?

Authors:  A J Ravenscroft; M D Bell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Two times what? Quantity and quality of life in tube feeding decisions.

Authors:  S J Youngner; E O'Toole; T Stellato
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The importance of word choice in the care of critically ill patients and their families.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Charles L Sprung; Elie Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit.

Authors:  J S Turner; W L Michell; C J Morgan; S R Benatar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  M Z Solomon; L O'Donnell; B Jennings; V Guilfoy; S M Wolf; K Nolan; R Jackson; D Koch-Weser; S Donnelley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The ethics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. I. Background to decision making.

Authors:  J M Davies; B M Reynolds
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Withdrawing may be preferable to withholding.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.