Literature DB >> 19081563

Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.

Ajay K Nangia1, Donald S Likosky, Dongmei Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the disparity of assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers in the United States as they relate to residential locations of populations in their reproductive years and state-mandated coverage for infertility services.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Population in reproductive years (women 20-44 years; men 20-49 years) based on US Census 2000 data. Assisted reproductive technology centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Populations within service area served by in-state and neighboring state ART centers as defined by a 60-minute travel time along road networks from each center. RESULT(S): Service areas for 387 of 390 ART centers were calculated. Fourteen states had some form of mandated coverage. Underserved states included Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, and West Virginia. The northeastern United States had the greatest percentage of overserved population with 66%-100% study population within 60 minutes of an ART center. Female age stratification showed the highest age group (35-44 years) per state in northern New England and the youngest in Utah and District of Columbia. Median total study population within 60 minutes of an ART center in their own state was higher in mandated versus nonmandated states. CONCLUSION(S): Disparity of access to care for infertility services exists from the standpoint of population service areas for ART centers and state-mandated coverage. Female age stratification may help anticipate future need for services with existing resource distribution. Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081563     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  7 in total

1.  Impact of satellite clinics on geographic access to assisted reproductive technology services in the United States.

Authors:  Micajah Z McGarity; Christopher N Herndon; John A Harris; Benjamin F Hobbs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 2.  Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.

Authors:  Tia Y Brodeur; Daniel Grow; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Differences in Women's Use of Medical Help for Becoming Pregnant by the Level of Urbanization of County of Residence in Georgia.

Authors:  Helen B Chin; Michael R Kramer; Ann C Mertens; Jessica B Spencer; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Patient identified factors influencing decisions to seek fertility care: adaptation of a wellness model.

Authors:  Kelsey Whittier Olerich; Karen Summers; Adam M Lewis; Kathleen Stewart; Ginny L Ryan
Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol       Date:  2019-12-20

5.  Infertility evaluation and access to assisted reproductive technologies among male military veterans: analysis of the South Florida Veterans Affairs experience.

Authors:  Joshua A Halpern; Joshua S Jue; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-05

Review 6.  Gaps in male infertility health services research.

Authors:  Andrew K Leung; Mark A Henry; Akanksha Mehta
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

7.  "Online" and "at-home" versus traditional models of health care: enhancing access or impeding optimal therapeutics?

Authors:  Raul Clavijo; Ranjith Ramasamy; Joshua Halpern; Alexis Melnick; Joshua Stewart; Zev Rosenwaks; Robert Brannigan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.490

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.