Literature DB >> 26769080

Differences in Women's Use of Medical Help for Becoming Pregnant by the Level of Urbanization of County of Residence in Georgia.

Helen B Chin1, Michael R Kramer1, Ann C Mertens2, Jessica B Spencer3, Penelope P Howards1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine if there are differences by place of residence in visiting a doctor for help getting pregnant in a population-based study.
METHODS: Using data from the Furthering Understanding of Cancer, Health, and Survivorship in Adult (FUCHSIA) Women's Study, a cohort study of fertility outcomes in reproductive-aged women in Georgia, we fit models to estimate the association between geographic type of residence and seeking help for becoming pregnant.
FINDINGS: The prevalence of visiting a doctor for help getting pregnant ranged from 13% to 17% across geographic groups. Women living in suburban counties were most likely to seek medical care for help getting pregnant compared with women living in urbanized counties (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.74-1.75); among women who reported infertility this difference was more pronounced (aPR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00-2.53). Women living in rural counties were equally likely to seek fertility care compared with women in urbanized counties in the full sample and among women who experienced infertility.
CONCLUSIONS: Women living in urban and rural counties were least likely to seek infertility care, suggesting that factors including but not limited to physical proximity to providers are influencing utilization of this type of care. Increased communication about reproductive goals and infertility care available to meet these goals by providers who women see for regular care may help address these barriers.
© 2016 National Rural Health Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to care; fertility care; geographic disparities; infertility; utilization of health services

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26769080      PMCID: PMC4945485          DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  24 in total

1.  MSJAMA. Where we live: health care in rural vs urban America.

Authors:  Jane van Dis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Urban and rural differences in health insurance and access to care.

Authors:  D Hartley; L Quam; N Lurie
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juliana Rigol Chachamovich; Eduardo Chachamovich; Hélène Ezer; Marcelo P Fleck; Daniela Knauth; Eduardo P Passos
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.949

4.  2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties.

Authors:  Deborah D Ingram; Sheila J Franco
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2014-04

5.  "It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Cara Nikolajski; Julia R Steinberg; Lori Freedman; Aletha Y Akers; Said Ibrahim; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982-2010.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Casey E Copen; Elizabeth Hervey Stephen
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2014-01-22

8.  Geographic disparities in patient travel for dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  J Mark Stephens; Samuel Brotherton; Stephan C Dunning; Larry C Emerson; David T Gilbertson; David J Harrison; John J Kochevar; Ann C McClellan; William M McClellan; Shaowei Wan; Matthew Gitlin
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara Crawford; John E Anderson; Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2013-12-06

10.  Disparities in accessibility of certified primary stroke centers.

Authors:  Michael T Mullen; Douglas J Wiebe; Ariel Bowman; Catherine S Wolff; Karen C Albright; Jason Roy; Laura J Balcer; Charles C Branas; Brendan G Carr
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.