Literature DB >> 19081410

Gender differences among patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR).

Nausheen Akhter1, Sarah Milford-Beland, Matthew T Roe, Robert N Piana, John Kao, Adhir Shroff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although prior studies have demonstrated disparities in the management and outcomes of women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), there are limited large-scale contemporary data on gender differences in post-intervention outcomes in this population.
METHODS: We analyzed patients according to 2 ACS categories, unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who had a percutaneous coronary intervention in the ACC-NCDR from January 1, 2004, to March 30, 2006. Of 199,690 patients, 55,691 women presented with UA/NSTEMI, and 12,335 women presented with STEMI. Clinical and angiographic characteristics, procedural and treatment patterns, and in-hospital outcomes were examined.
RESULTS: Women presented more often with UA/NSTEMI than men (82% of women vs 77% of men, P < .0001). Despite having greater comorbidities, women in both ACS categories had fewer high risk angiographic features than men. Women were less likely to receive aspirin or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and were less often discharged on aspirin or statin. For in-hospital mortality, the adjusted odds ratio for men compared to women was similar (odds ratio 0.97, P = .5). Women had higher rates of cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, any bleeding, and any vascular complications. Importantly, rates of subacute stent thrombosis were less in women compared to men (0.43% vs 0.57%, P = .0003).
CONCLUSIONS: Although women had fewer high-risk angiographic features than men, they continue to have higher rates of in-hospital complications. This suggests the need for gender-tailored techniques to minimize post-intervention complications and maximize application of evidence-based antiplatelet therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19081410     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  46 in total

1.  Gender gap in acute coronary heart disease: Myth or reality?

Authors:  Mette Claassen; Kirsten C Sybrandy; Yolande E Appelman; Folkert W Asselbergs
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-26

2.  Is the difference in outcome between men and women treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention age dependent? Gender difference in STEMI stratified on age.

Authors:  Amber M Otten; Angela H E M Maas; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Anita Kloosterman; Arnoud W J van 't Hof; Jan Henk E Dambrink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Jan C A Hoorntje; Harry Suryapranata; Menko Jan de Boer
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-01-31

3.  Polycythemia vera: gender-related phenotypic differences.

Authors:  Raffaele Landolfi; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Maria Anna Nicolazzi; Igor Giarretta; RosaMaria Marfisi; Roberto Marchioli
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Sex-Specific Disparities in Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Stacey E Rosen; Sonia Henry; Rachel Bond; Camille Pearte; Jennifer H Mieres
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Sustained sex-based treatment differences in acute coronary syndrome care: Insights from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines Coronary Artery Disease Registry.

Authors:  Jacob A Udell; Gregg C Fonarow; Thomas M Maddox; Christopher P Cannon; W Frank Peacock; Warren K Laskey; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Eric E Smith; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Sex differences in the treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chen-Fang Lin; Li-Jiuan Shen; Fei-Yuan Hsiao; Churn-Shiouh Gau; Fe-Lin Lin Wu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 7.  Gender Disparities in Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Matthew Liakos; Puja B Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies in men and women following percutaneous coronary interventions: an observational study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; Lauren E Thompson; Sunghee Kim; Sunil V Rao; Sumeet Subherwal; Thomas T Tsai; John C Messenger; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Visualization of coronary wall atherosclerosis in asymptomatic subjects and patients with coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Suzanne C Gerretsen; M Eline Kooi; Alfons G Kessels; Simon Schalla; Marcus Katoh; Rob J van der Geest; Warren J Manning; Johannes Waltenberger; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Rene M Botnar; Tim Leiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gender-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome from Oman.

Authors:  Kadhim Sulaiman; Prashanth Panduranga; Ibrahim Al-Zakwani
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.