Literature DB >> 19081014

Inflammation-based prognostic score, prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, predicts postoperative outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Takashi Kobayashi1, Masanori Teruya, Tomokazu Kishiki, Daisuke Endo, Yoshiharu Takenaka, Hozumi Tanaka, Kenji Miki, Kaoru Kobayashi, Koji Morita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have revealed that Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), an inflammation-based prognostic score, is associated with poor outcome in a variety of tumors. However, few studies have investigated whether GPS measured prior to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is useful for postoperative prognosis of patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
METHODS: GPS was calculated on the basis of admission data as follows: patients with both an elevated C-reactive protein (>10 mg/L) and hypoalbuminaemia (<35 g/L) were allocated a GPS score of 2. Patients in whom only 1 of these biochemical abnormalities was present were allocated a GPS score of 1, and patients with a normal C-reactive protein and albumin were allocated a score of 0. All patients underwent radical en-bloc resection 3-4 weeks after nCRT.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients with clinical TNM stage II/III were enrolled. Univariate analyses revealed that there were significant differences in cancer-specific survival in relation to grade of response to nCRT (P = .004), lymph node status (P = .0065), lymphatic invasion (P = .0002), venous invasion (P = .0001), pathological TNM classification (P = .015), and GPS (P < .0001). GPS classification showed a close relationship with lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, and number of lymph node (P = .0292, .0473, and .0485, respectively). GPS was found to be the only independent predictor of cancer-specific survival (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.52; P = .0019).
CONCLUSIONS: GPS, measured prior to nCRT, is an independent novel predictor of postoperative outcome in patients with advanced ESCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19081014     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  36 in total

1.  Modified glasgow prognostic score as a prognostic factor in gastriccancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinwu Zhang; Xi Chen; Tao Wu; Yan Zhang; Kun Yan; Xiaoli Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  The Glasgow Prognostic Score accurately predicts survival in patients with biliary tract cancer not indicated for surgical resection.

Authors:  Akira Iwaku; Akiyoshi Kinoshita; Hiroshi Onoda; Nao Fushiya; Hirokazu Nishino; Masato Matsushima; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Comparison of pre-treatment clinical prognostic factors in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer and proposal of a new staging system.

Authors:  Andrew B C Crumley; Robert C Stuart; Margaret McKernan; James J Going; Christopher J Shearer; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Results of neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy for patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Lin; Longfei Ma; Ting Ye; Yunjian Pan; Longlong Shao; Zuodong Song; Shujun Jiang; Haiquan Chen; Jiaqing Xiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Pretreatment prognostic nutritional index is a significant predictor of prognosis in patients with cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Junko Haraga; Keiichiro Nakamura; Chiaki Omichi; Takeshi Nishida; Tomoko Haruma; Tomoyuki Kusumoto; Noriko Seki; Hisashi Masuyama; Norihisa Katayama; Susumu Kanazawa; Yuji Hiramatsu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-21

6.  Clinical Significance of the Glasgow Prognostic Score for Survival after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Tunc Eren; Busra Burcu; Ercument Tombalak; Tugrul Ozdemir; Metin Leblebici; Ibrahim Ali Ozemir; Sedat Ziyade; Orhan Alimoglu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Prognostic value of an inflammation-based score in patients undergoing pre-operative chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Miyata; Makoto Yamasaki; Yukinori Kurokawa; Shuji Takiguchi; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Prognostic significance of the modified Glasgow prognostic score in elderly patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kotaro Hirashima; Masayuki Watanabe; Hironobu Shigaki; Yu Imamura; Satoshi Ida; Masaaki Iwatsuki; Takatsugu Ishimoto; Shiro Iwagami; Yoshifumi Baba; Hideo Baba
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 7.527

9.  Comparison of the prognostic value of tumour- and patient-related factors in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sumanta Dutta; Andrew B C Crumley; Grant M Fullarton; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer: comparison of the prognostic value of tumour and patient related factors.

Authors:  Campbell Roxburgh; Alec McDonald; Jonathan Salmond; Karin Oien; John Anderson; Ruth McKee; Paul Horgan; Donald McMillan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.