BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is better than routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting intracranial calcification. This study aimed to assess the value of MR susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in the detection and differentiation of intracranial calcification and hemorrhage. METHODS: Enrolled in this study were 35 patients including 13 cases of calcification demonstrated by CT and 22 cases of intracerebral hemorrhage. MR sequences used in all the subjects included axial T1WI, T2WI and SWI. The phase shift (PS) of calcification and hemorrhage on SWI was calculated and their signal features on corrected phase images were compared. The sensitivity of T1WI, T2WI and SWI in detecting intracranial calcification and hemorrhage was analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The detection rate of SWI for cranial calcification was 98.2%, significantly higher than that of T1WI and T2WI. It was not significantly different from that of CT (P > 0.05). There were 49 hemorrhagic lesions at different stages detected on SWI, 30 on T2WI and 18 on T1WI. The average PS of calcification and hemorrhage was +0.734 +/- 0.073 and -0.112 +/- 0.032 respectively (P < 0.05). The PS of calcification was positive and presented as a high signal or the mixed signal dominated by a high signal on the corrected phase images, whereas the PS of hemorrhage was negative and presented as a low signal or the mixed signal dominated by a low signal. CONCLUSIONS: SWI can accurately demonstrate intracranial calcification, not dependant on CT. Being more sensitive than routine MRI in detecting micro-hemorrhage, SWI may play an important role in differentiating cerebral diseases associated with calcification or hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is better than routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting intracranial calcification. This study aimed to assess the value of MR susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in the detection and differentiation of intracranial calcification and hemorrhage. METHODS: Enrolled in this study were 35 patients including 13 cases of calcification demonstrated by CT and 22 cases of intracerebral hemorrhage. MR sequences used in all the subjects included axial T1WI, T2WI and SWI. The phase shift (PS) of calcification and hemorrhage on SWI was calculated and their signal features on corrected phase images were compared. The sensitivity of T1WI, T2WI and SWI in detecting intracranial calcification and hemorrhage was analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The detection rate of SWI for cranial calcification was 98.2%, significantly higher than that of T1WI and T2WI. It was not significantly different from that of CT (P > 0.05). There were 49 hemorrhagic lesions at different stages detected on SWI, 30 on T2WI and 18 on T1WI. The average PS of calcification and hemorrhage was +0.734 +/- 0.073 and -0.112 +/- 0.032 respectively (P < 0.05). The PS of calcification was positive and presented as a high signal or the mixed signal dominated by a high signal on the corrected phase images, whereas the PS of hemorrhage was negative and presented as a low signal or the mixed signal dominated by a low signal. CONCLUSIONS: SWI can accurately demonstrate intracranial calcification, not dependant on CT. Being more sensitive than routine MRI in detecting micro-hemorrhage, SWI may play an important role in differentiating cerebral diseases associated with calcification or hemorrhage.
Authors: Ulrike Löbel; Jan Sedlacik; Noah D Sabin; Mehmet Kocak; Alberto Broniscer; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Zoltán Patay Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: M Azuma; K Maekawa; A Yamashita; K Yokogami; M Enzaki; Z A Khant; H Takeshima; Y Asada; Y Wang; T Hirai Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lisa C Adams; Sarah M Böker; Yvonne Y Bender; Eva M Fallenberg; Moritz Wagner; Thomas Liebig; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Lauri Juhani Lehto; Alejandra Sierra; Curtis Andrew Corum; Jinjin Zhang; Djaudat Idiyatullin; Asla Pitkänen; Michael Garwood; Olli Gröhn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Dominik Nörenberg; Marco Armbruster; Yi-Na Bender; Thula Walter; Hans U Ebersberger; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; Ben Ockert; Marcus R Makowski Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Delia Fahrendorf; Wolfram Schwindt; Johannes Wölfer; Astrid Jeibmann; Hendrik Kooijman; Harald Kugel; Oliver Grauer; Walter Heindel; Volker Hesselmann; Andrea Bink Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 5.315