BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: SWI is a unique pulse sequence sensitive to both hemorrhage and calcification. Our aim was to retrospectively assess the ability of SWI to detect intratumoral calcification in ODs compared with conventional MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using CT as criterion standard, the MR imaging findings from 71 patients (33 males, 38 females; mean age, 42.5 years) with pathologically proved OD were retrospectively evaluated. We classified the MR imaging data into SWI data (MRSWI) and traditional pulse sequences (MRnoSWI). The sensitivity and specificity of the MRnoSWI (n = 71) were compared with that of the MRSWI (n = 13) independently and also for matched-paired data (n = 13). The Fisher exact test was applied to the matched-pair data for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: For paired data of MRSWI and MRnoSWI (n = 13), there was significantly increased sensitivity of MRSWI (86%) for the detection of intratumoral calcification in OD compared with the MRnoSWI (14.3%) (P = .015, Fisher exact test) by using CT as the criterion standard. The overall accuracy of MRSWI for the paired data was also significantly greater (P = .048). The specificities were not significantly different (P = .773). The sensitivity of MRSWI (n = 13) was 86%, and for MRnoSWI (n = 71), it was 33.3%. Specificity of MRSWI was 83%, and for MRnoSWI, it was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: SWI is better able to detect calcification in ODs than conventional MR imaging pulse sequences.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: SWI is a unique pulse sequence sensitive to both hemorrhage and calcification. Our aim was to retrospectively assess the ability of SWI to detect intratumoral calcification in ODs compared with conventional MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using CT as criterion standard, the MR imaging findings from 71 patients (33 males, 38 females; mean age, 42.5 years) with pathologically proved OD were retrospectively evaluated. We classified the MR imaging data into SWI data (MRSWI) and traditional pulse sequences (MRnoSWI). The sensitivity and specificity of the MRnoSWI (n = 71) were compared with that of the MRSWI (n = 13) independently and also for matched-paired data (n = 13). The Fisher exact test was applied to the matched-pair data for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: For paired data of MRSWI and MRnoSWI (n = 13), there was significantly increased sensitivity of MRSWI (86%) for the detection of intratumoral calcification in OD compared with the MRnoSWI (14.3%) (P = .015, Fisher exact test) by using CT as the criterion standard. The overall accuracy of MRSWI for the paired data was also significantly greater (P = .048). The specificities were not significantly different (P = .773). The sensitivity of MRSWI (n = 13) was 86%, and for MRnoSWI (n = 71), it was 33.3%. Specificity of MRSWI was 83%, and for MRnoSWI, it was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: SWI is better able to detect calcification in ODs than conventional MR imaging pulse sequences.
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: J Matthew McDonald; Siew Ju See; Ivo W Tremont; Howard Colman; Mark R Gilbert; Morris Groves; Peter C Burger; David N Louis; Caterina Giannini; Gregory Fuller; Sandra Passe; Hilary Blair; Robert B Jenkins; Helen Yang; Alicia Ledoux; Joann Aaron; Ulka Tipnis; Wei Zhang; Kenneth Hess; Ken Aldape Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Dominik Nörenberg; Marco Armbruster; Yi-Na Bender; Thula Walter; Hans U Ebersberger; Gerd Diederichs; Bernd Hamm; Ben Ockert; Marcus R Makowski Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Matthias W Wagner; Andrea Poretti; Thierry A G M Huisman; Thangamadhan Bosemani Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: F Rodjan; P de Graaf; P van der Valk; T Hadjistilianou; A Cerase; P Toti; M C de Jong; A C Moll; J A Castelijns; P Galluzzi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.825