Literature DB >> 19079961

Embryo biopsy: the fate of abnormal pronuclear embryos.

Nicole Noyes1, M Elizabeth Fino, Lewis Krey, Caroline McCaffrey, Alexis Adler, James Grifo.   

Abstract

This study assessed 1908 embryos, including those with abnormal numbers of pronuclei, in IVF cycles from July 2001 to December 2006 in which preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) was performed on day 3 post-retrieval and 'euploid' embryos transferred the following day. PGS-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and PGS-translocation cycles were excluded. At 18 h post-insemination, the zygote distribution was 19% 0PN, 4% 1PN, 69% 2PN and 8% 3PN. No pregnancy occurred following 0PN or 1PN embryo transfers. A retrospective, blinded morphological ranking of all embryos on day 3 was performed and the results compared with PGS; no 0PN or 1PN embryo would have been chosen for transfer based on morphological superiority alone. Blastocyst formation occurred in 1PN embryos (29%) but not in 0PN embryos when evaluated on day 5. Euploid karyotypes were reported for biopsies of 0PN (3%), 1PN (5%) and 2PN (19%) embryos (P = 0.015, 1PN versus 2PN). A Y chromosome was observed in 0PN (17%) and 1PN (32%) embryos; surprisingly, 91% of these Y chromosome-bearing embryos were aneuploid. Many different meiotic and fertilization errors can result in 0PN or 1PN zygotes; these results indicate that the resultant embryos should not be transferred, especially when normally fertilized embryos are available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19079961     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60405-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  7 in total

1.  Aneuploidy analysis of non-pronuclear embryos from IVF with use of array CGH: a case report.

Authors:  Deng Lixin; Xiang Zhifeng; He Cong; Zhang Jinzhou; Xie Hongbin
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.611

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Live births resulting from 0PN-derived embryos in conventional IVF cycles.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Xing Ling Wang; Xiao Zhang; Chun Yan Shen; Zhan Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Clinical outcomes of transfer of frozen and thawed single blastocysts derived from nonpronuclear and monopronuclear zygotes.

Authors:  Saki Hondo; Akane Arichi; Hirotaka Muramatsu; Naoki Omura; Kaori Ito; Hokuto Komine; Shiho Monzen; Naoko Mukai; Miyuki Endo; Serina Katase; Nobuyuki Kidera; Hiroshi Sasaki; Hideki Koi; Takeshi Yorimitsu; Motohiro Ohara; Toshihiro Kawamura; Yasufumi Shimizu
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-15

5.  Time-lapse monitoring of fertilized human oocytes focused on the incidence of 0PN embryos in conventional in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kobayashi; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Kumiko Ishii; Asuka Sato; Natsuko Nakamura; Yoshiko Saito; Hisataka Hasegawa; Maki Fujita; Akira Mitsuhashi; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparisons of the effects of long-acting and short-acting GnRH agonists on embryo quality, endometrial thickness and pregnancy rate in human in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Gen-Hong Mao; Zonggang Feng; Yan He; Yu-Rong Huang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Does the cell number of 0PN embryos on day 3 affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wenzhi Li; Mingru Yin; Menghui Li; Ling Wu; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Bin Li; Zheng Yan; Qifeng Lyu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.