Literature DB >> 19079762

Hospital Quality and Selective Contracting: Evidence from Kidney Transplantation.

David H Howard1.   

Abstract

Most private health insurers offer a limited network of providers to enrollees. Critics have questioned whether selective contracting benefits patients. Plans counter that they take quality into account when choosing providers. Using data on five plans' networks for kidney transplant hospitals, this study shows that in-network hospitals have better outcomes than out-of-network facilities. Conditional logit estimates using patient level data confirm this result: compared to Medicare patients, privately-insured patients are more likely to register at hospitals with higher survival rates. Restricting choice has the potential to improve patient welfare if plans steer uninformed patients to high quality hospitals and physicians.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19079762      PMCID: PMC2600561          DOI: 10.2202/1558-9544.1088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forum Health Econ Policy        ISSN: 1558-9544


  16 in total

1.  Centers of excellence or centers of discount?

Authors:  J M Burns; J Miller; L Miller
Journal:  Bus Health       Date:  2000-10

2.  Measuring adverse selection in managed health care.

Authors:  R G Frank; J Glazer; T G McGuire
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  HMO penetration, competition, and risk-adjusted hospital mortality.

Authors:  D B Mukamel; J Zwanziger; K J Tomaszewski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Quality of cardiac surgeons and managed care contracting practices.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; Jack Zwanziger; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The determinants of HMOs' contracting with hospitals for bypass surgery.

Authors:  Darrell J Gaskin; José J Escarce; Kevin Schulman; Jack Hadley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  The life-years saved by a deceased organ donor.

Authors:  Mark A Schnitzler; James F Whiting; Daniel C Brennan; Krista L Lentine; Niraj M Desai; William Chapman; Kevin C Abbott; Zoltan Kalo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Patients' global ratings of their health care are not associated with the technical quality of their care.

Authors:  John T Chang; Ron D Hays; Paul G Shekelle; Catherine H MacLean; David H Solomon; David B Reuben; Carol P Roth; Caren J Kamberg; John Adams; Roy T Young; Neil S Wenger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A wolf dressed in sheep's clothing: perhaps quality measures are just unmeasured severity.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Avi Dor; Michael Grossman
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.561

9.  Use of public performance reports: a survey of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  E C Schneider; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Hospital competition, managed care, and mortality after hospitalization for medical conditions in California.

Authors:  Jeannette Rogowski; Arvind K Jain; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patient selection in the presence of regulatory oversight based on healthcare report cards of providers: the case of organ transplantation.

Authors:  Mariétou H Ouayogodé; Kurt E Schnier
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2021-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.