| Literature DB >> 19078848 |
Qinyu Ge1, Pinfei Yu, Yunfei Bai, Zuhong Lu.
Abstract
In this paper we describe a novel method for detecting many DNA fragments through efficient amplification by using an emulsion system based on "on-chip" PCR instead of conventional multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). During the preparation of on-chip PCR, a set of primers were immobilized on a slide and other sets were in an emulsion system. Different emulsion phase primers and other related PCR components were dispersed in different droplets of the emulsion system, and then, due to the thermal instability of emulsion droplets, they would be released onto the surface of the slide after preheating in the first PCR step. To test the above method, we used plasma DNAs from pregnant women who was carrying a male fetus for gender identification. Four different Y chromosome DNA fragments were selected. Results showed that different DNA fragments could be simultaneously amplified with satisfactory results. It is suggested that a simple, convenient and inexpensive on-chip PCR method has been developed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19078848 PMCID: PMC6245313 DOI: 10.3390/molecules13123057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The EC-PCR strategy.
Figure 2Thermal instability of certain emulsion system.
Figure 3Reliability of the EC-PCR.
DNA sequences of the primers used in this study.
| Name | DNA Sequences (5’ to 3’) | 5’Modification | GenBank No. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRY | 462F | (T)6GCAGGGTACCGAAGAGGGA | amido | gi:785026 |
| 210R | (T)6GTCTCGCGATCAGAGGCGCAAGA | |||
| DYS12 | 423F | (T)6ACTTCCCTCTGACATTACCTGATAATTG | amido | gi:245973 |
| 172R | GTCATAGAAGAGTCAAGTCAGTCA | |||
| DYS14 | 637F | (T)6GCCAGGAAGGCCTTTTCTCGGCA | amido | gi:38003 |
| 880R | TTCCCCTTTGTTCCCCAAA | |||
| DYZ | 33642F | (T)6GTGGATTCATCTCACAGAGTTAAA | amido | gi:29824712 |
| 33259R | ACACATCACAAAGAACTATG |
Fetal sex identification results of the 23 samples detected by EC-PCR.
| Samples | Gestation Ages | Signals obtained in the sites detected | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRY | DYS12 | DYS14 | DYZ | ||
| 1 | 54 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 2 | 53 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 3 | 42 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 4 | 61 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 5 | 44 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 6 | 44 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 7 | 57 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 8 | 55 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 9 | 45 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 10 | 56 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 11* | 52 Days | √ | × | √ | √ |
| 12 | 55 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 13 | 61 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 14 | 43 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 15 | 48 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 16** | 35 Days | × | × | × | × |
| 17 | 47 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 18 | 65 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 19 | 74 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 20* | 40 Days | √ | √ | √ | × |
| 21 | 60 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 22 | 51 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 23 | 46 Days | √ | √ | √ | √ |
* sample which the four sites not all detected ** sample which obtained false negative result
Figure 5Comparing results of non-emulsion based on chip PCR.
Figure 4Results of fetal sex identification by the EC-PCR.