Literature DB >> 14652698

Do we need randomised trials to evaluate diagnostic procedures? Against.

Peter E Valk1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652698     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1385-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents.

Authors:  D J Cook; G H Guyatt; A Laupacis; D L Sackett
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Increasing the scientific quality of clinical efficacy studies of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J R Thornbury; D K Kido; A I Mushlin; C E Phelps; C Mooney; D G Fryback
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  D G Fryback; J R Thornbury
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Evaluation of computed tomography: achievement and challenge.

Authors:  H V Fineberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations.

Authors:  C B Begg; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  How to read clinical journals: II. To learn about a diagnostic test.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1981-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Health technology assessment and cancer imaging: who should be setting the agenda?

Authors:  Rodney J Hicks
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 3.909

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.