Literature DB >> 19077011

Emotional care experienced by hospitalised patients: development and testing of a measurement instrument.

Anne M Williams1, Linda J Kristjanson.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the development and preliminary psychometric testing of an instrument that evaluates the emotional care experienced by patients during hospitalisation.
BACKGROUND: Previous qualitative work using the Grounded Theory method identified the characteristics of interpersonal interactions that hospitalised patients perceived to be therapeutic. Three conditions were associated with the patient's experience of emotional comfort: the patient's perceived Level of Security, Level of Knowing and Level of Personal Value. Questions relating to each of these conditions were included in this new instrument.
DESIGN: Instrument development and psychometric testing.
METHOD: Preliminary psychometric testing was carried out in four phases: construction of the instrument; assessment of face and content validity; testing for clarity and feasibility for use with hospitalised patients; assessment of reliability, construct validity of the tool and assessment of the internal structure.
CONCLUSIONS: A hospital-wide survey was carried out and the instrument was completed by a total sample of 132 patients. Two of the three sub-scales achieved an internal consistency estimate of at least 0.70. The construct validity of the tool confirmed the previously identified characteristics of patients in need of additional emotional care. Exploratory factor analysis established two of the sub-scales and identified a fourth sub-scale which was named 'Level of Connection'. Encouraging reliability and validity estimates were obtained and the instrument was improved. Further testing with larger samples is recommended. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This questionnaire, which is completed by hospitalised patients, differs from other instruments because it evaluates the interactions of all hospital staff rather than only nursing staff. This instrument can be used to identify patients who may be in need of additional emotional care and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions directed at improving the emotional well-being of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19077011     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02586.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  8 in total

1.  Hospitalised patients' experiences during Negative Pressure Wound Therapy due to surgical site infection after vascular and cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Charlotte B Thorup; Mette Hougaard; Pernille F Blindum; Erik E Sørensen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Patient-Centered Care and Patient-Reported Measures: Let's Look Before We Leap.

Authors:  Daniel Miller; Carolyn Steele Gray; Kerry Kuluski; Cheryl Cott
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The Quality of Interactions Schedule (QuIS) and person-centred care: Concurrent validity in acute hospital settings.

Authors:  Jackie Bridges; Lisa Gould; Joanna Hope; Lisette Schoonhoven; Peter Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud Adv       Date:  2019-11

4.  What Was Helpful Questionnaire (WHQ): Psychometric Properties of a Novel Tool Designed to Capture Parental Perceived Helpfulness of Interventions in Children Requiring Mental Health Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Ifigeneia Mourelatou; Jorge Gaete; Sandra Fewings; Oona Hickie; Marinos Kyriakopoulos
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Measuring relational aspects of hospital care in England with the 'Patient Evaluation of Emotional Care during Hospitalisation' (PEECH) survey questionnaire.

Authors:  Trevor Murrells; Glenn Robert; Mary Adams; Elizabeth Morrow; Jill Maben
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Can Healthcare Assistant Training (CHAT) improve the relational care of older people? Study protocol for a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Antony Arthur; Jill Maben; Heather Wharrad; Clare Aldus; Sophie Sarre; Justine Schneider; Caroline Nicholson; Garry Barton; Karen Cox; Allan Clark
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Reliability, feasibility, and validity of the quality of interactions schedule (QuIS) in acute hospital care: an observational study.

Authors:  Christopher McLean; Peter Griffiths; Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray; Ruth M Pickering; Jackie Bridges
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The Relational Aspects of Care Questionnaire: item reduction and scoring using inpatient and accident and emergency data in England.

Authors:  Laura Kelly; Steve Sizmur; Susanne Käsbauer; Jenny King; Robyn Cooper; Crispin Jenkinson; Chris Graham
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2018-06-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.