Literature DB >> 19076141

Urothelial and incidental prostate carcinoma in prostates from cystoprostatectomies for bladder cancer: is there a relationship between urothelial and prostate cancer?

Francesca Barbisan1, Roberta Mazzucchelli, Marina Scarpelli, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Liang Cheng, Ziya Kirkali, Rodolfo Montironi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and features of urothelial carcinoma (UC) involving the prostate (UCP) and of prostate adenocarcinoma (PA) in radical cystoprostatectomy (RCP) for bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The whole-mount prostate sections of 248 RCP consecutively examined from 1995 to 2007 were reviewed to determine the incidence and features of UCP and PA. UCP was separately evaluated for UC originating from the urethra and peri-urethral ducts (PUC) and for direct extension of bladder UC.
RESULTS: There was UCP in 94 (37.9%) of 248 patients, whereas PUC was present in 78 (31.5%). UC in situ and noninvasive papillary PUC was present in 42 (53.9%) of the 78, whereas stromal invasion was present in 36 (46.1%). Direct extension of UC from the bladder only was present in 16 (6.5%) patients. PA was present in 123 (49.6%) of 248 patients; 96 (78.1%) were in the peripheral zone. In 107 patients (87%) the Gleason score was <or=6; 96 (78.1%) were pT2a, with a lower frequency in other pT categories. The margins were negative in 96.7% of cases. All patients were pN0 for PA; in 116 (95.1%) the volume was <0.5 mL. Of the 123 patients with incidental prostate cancer, 100 cancers (81.3%) were considered clinically insignificant. UCP coexisted with PA in 43 (17.3%) of 248 patients, whereas PUC and PA occurred together in the same prostate in 32 (12.9%). Direct extension of UC from the bladder and PA occurred together in the same prostate in 11 (4.4%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: UC involving the prostate and PA are present in most RCP specimens. UC can arise from extension of trigonal or bladder-neck tumours, proximal prostate ducts/urethra, or from cell implantation from manipulation of vesical neoplasms. The frequent high coincidence of prostate and bladder cancer can be explained by a common pathway of carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19076141     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08207.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  The incidence and relevance of prostate cancer in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  M Alsinnawi; B Loftus; R Flynn; T McDermott; R Grainger; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Clinical Significance of Incidental Prostatic Carcinoma on Radical Cystectomy Histology Specimens: a Clinicopathological and Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Dharma Ram; Suhas K Rajappa; Sudhir Rawal; Amitabh Singh; Kailash Chand Sharma; Ajay Kumar Dewan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-04-21

3.  Incidental prostate cancer prevalence at radical cystoprostatectomy--importance of the histopathological work-up.

Authors:  C Wetterauer; M Weibel; J R Gsponer; T Vlajnic; T Zellweger; S Bütikofer; G Müller; H Püschel; A Bachmann; T C Gasser; L Bubendorf; C A Rentsch
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Concomitant bladder cancer and prostate cancer: challenges and controversies.

Authors:  Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Liang Cheng; Francesco Montorsi; Maria Scarpelli; Maria R Raspollini; Rodolfo Montironi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Concomitant Gleason Score ≥ 7 prostate cancer is an independent prognosticator for poor survival in nonmetastatic bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian Thomas; Alexander Giesswein; Michael Hainz; Raimund Stein; Peter Rubenwolf; Frederik C Roos; Andreas Neisius; Sebastian Nestler; Christian Hampel; Wolfgang Jäger; Christoph Wiesner; Joachim W Thüroff
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Incidentally found prostate cancer and influence on overall survival after radical cystoprostatectomy.

Authors:  Algimantas Sruogis; Albertas Ulys; Giedre Smailyte; Zygimantas Kardelis; Arunas Kulboka; Giedre Anglickienė; Nerimantas Samalavicius; Marius Anglickis
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2012-06-03

7.  Clinicopathologic features of incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Berna Aytac; Hakan Vuruskan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Impact of the Level of Urothelial Carcinoma Involvement of the Prostate on Survival after Radical Cystectomy.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Francesco Soria; Martin Susani; Stephan Korn; Alberto Briganti; Morgan Roupret; Christian Seitz; Killian Gust; Andrea Haitel; Francesco Montorsi; Gregory Wirth; Brian D Robinson; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mehmet Özsoy; Michael Rink; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27

9.  Undiagnosed prostatic malignancy at the time of radical cystoprostatectomy after prior prostatic radiation therapy.

Authors:  Pranav Sharma; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Philippe E Spiess; Wade J Sexton; Michael A Poch
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  Prostate cancer incidentally discovered at the time of radical cystoprostatectomy does not decrease overall survival: Results from a large Chinese medical center.

Authors:  Shiying Tang; Han Hao; Dong Fang; Wei Zheng; Peng Ge; Xiaohong Su; Qun He; Xinyu Yang; Qi Shen; Xuesong Li; Wei Yu; Jian Lin; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.