Literature DB >> 19075362

Single-Arc IMRT?

Thomas Bortfeld1, Steve Webb.   

Abstract

The idea of delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with a multileaf collimator in a continuous dynamic mode during a single rotation of the gantry has recently gained momentum both in research and industry. In this note we investigate the potential of this Single-Arc IMRT technique at a conceptual level. We consider the original theoretical example case from Brahme et al that got the field of IMRT started. Using analytical methods, we derive deliverable intensity 'landscapes' for Single-Arc as well as standard IMRT and Tomotherapy. We find that Tomotherapy provides the greatest flexibility in shaping intensity landscapes and that it allows one to deliver IMRT in a way that comes close to the ideal case in the transverse plane. Single-Arc and standard IMRT make compromises in different areas. Only in relatively simple cases that do not require substantial intensity modulation will Single-Arc be dosimetrically comparable to Tomotherapy. Compared with standard IMRT, Single-Arc could be dosimetrically superior in certain cases if one is willing to accept the spreading of low dose values over large volumes of normal tissue. In terms of treatment planning, Single-Arc poses a more challenging optimization problem than Tomotherapy or standard IMRT. We conclude that Single-Arc holds potential as an efficient IMRT technique especially for relatively simple cases. In very complex cases, Single-Arc may unduly compromise the quality of the dose distribution, if one tries to keep the treatment time below 2 min or so. As with all IMRT techniques, it is important to explore the tradeoff between plan quality and the efficiency of its delivery carefully for each individual case.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19075362     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/1/N02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  54 in total

1.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with field rotation--a time-varying fractionation study.

Authors:  Delal Dink; Mark P Langer; Ronald L Rardin; Joseph F Pekny; Gintaras V Reklaitis; Behlul Saka
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-01-10

2.  Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tsair-Fwu Lee; Pei-Ju Chao; Hui-Min Ting; Su-Hua Lo; Yu-Wen Wang; Chiu-Ching Tuan; Fu-Min Fang; Te-Jen Su
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Bridging the gap between IMRT and VMAT: dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of total MU and segment areas in VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT plans.

Authors:  Motohiro Kawashima; Shuichi Ozawa; Akihiro Haga; Akira Sakumi; Chie Kurokawa; Satoru Sugimoto; Kumiko Karasawa; Keiichi Nakagawa; Keisuke Sasai
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

5.  The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Dirk Van Gestel; Dirk Verellen; Lien Van De Voorde; Bie de Ost; Geert De Kerf; Olivier Vanderveken; Carl Van Laer; Danielle Van den Weyngaert; Jan B Vermorken; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-30

6.  Exploring trade-offs between VMAT dose quality and delivery efficiency using a network optimization approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Salari; Jeremiah Wala; David Craft
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimized hybrid megavoltage-kilovoltage imaging protocol for volumetric prostate arc therapy.

Authors:  Wu Liu; Rodney D Wiersma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  VMAT optimization with dynamic collimator rotation.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  The number of beams in IMRT--theoretical investigations and implications for single-arc IMRT.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study.

Authors:  Jun Lian; Lulin Yuan; Yaorong Ge; Bhishamjit S Chera; David P Yoo; Sha Chang; FangFang Yin; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.