Literature DB >> 19949256

The number of beams in IMRT--theoretical investigations and implications for single-arc IMRT.

Thomas Bortfeld1.   

Abstract

The first purpose of this paper is to shed some new light on the old question of selecting the number of beams in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The second purpose is to illuminate the related issue of discrete static beam angles versus rotational techniques, which has recently re-surfaced due to the advancement of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). A specific objective is to find analytical expressions that allow one to address the points raised above. To make the problem mathematically tractable, it is assumed that the depth dose is flat and that the lateral dose profile can be approximated by polynomials, specifically Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind, of finite degree. The application of methods known from image reconstruction then allows one to answer the first question above as follows: the required number of beams is determined by the maximum degree of the polynomials used in the approximation of the beam profiles, which is a measure of the dose variability. There is nothing to be gained by using more beams. In realistic cases, in which the variability of the lateral dose profile is restricted in several ways, the required number of beams is of the order of 10-20. The consequence of delivering the beams with a 'leaf sweep' technique during continuous rotation of the gantry, as in VMAT, is also derived in an analytical form. The main effect is that the beams fan out, but the effect near the axis of rotation is small. This result can serve as a theoretical justification of VMAT. Overall the analytical derivations in this paper, albeit based on strong simplifications, provide new insights into, and a deeper understanding of, the beam angle problem in IMRT. The decomposition of the beam profiles into well-behaved and easily deliverable smooth functions, such as Chebyshev polynomials, could be of general interest in IMRT treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19949256      PMCID: PMC3142715          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/1/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Fast and exact 2D image reconstruction by means of Chebyshev decomposition and backprojection.

Authors:  T Bortfeld; U Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Clinical dosimetry for implementation of a multileaf collimator.

Authors:  A L Boyer; T G Ochran; C E Nyerick; T J Waldron; C J Huntzinger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Sweeping-window arc therapy: an implementation of rotational IMRT with automatic beam-weight calculation.

Authors:  C Cameron
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Development of an optimization concept for arc-modulated cone beam therapy.

Authors:  Silke Ulrich; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc.

Authors:  Karl Otto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Arc-modulated radiation therapy (AMRT): a single-arc form of intensity-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Shuang Luan; Grace Tang; Danny Z Chen; Matt A Earl; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  When becometh less more?

Authors:  R Mohan; C C Ling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-08-30       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A problem in rotation therapy with X-rays: dose distributions with an axis of symmetry.

Authors:  A M Cormack; R A Cormack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A problem in rotation therapy with X rays.

Authors:  A M Cormack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  T R Mackie; T Holmes; S Swerdloff; P Reckwerdt; J O Deasy; J Yang; B Paliwal; T Kinsella
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  16 in total

1.  RapidArc combined with the active breathing coordinator provides an effective and accurate approach for the radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  G Z Gong; Y Yin; L G Xing; Y J Guo; T Liu; J Chen; J Lu; C Ma; T Sun; T Bai; G Zhang; R Wang
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Single-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy can provide dose distributions equivalent to fixed-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostatic irradiation with seminal vesicle and/or lymph node involvement.

Authors:  J D Fontenot; M L King; S A Johnson; C G Wood; M J Price; K K Lo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Optimization approaches to volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.

Authors:  Jan Unkelbach; Thomas Bortfeld; David Craft; Markus Alber; Mark Bangert; Rasmus Bokrantz; Danny Chen; Ruijiang Li; Lei Xing; Chunhua Men; Simeon Nill; Dávid Papp; Edwin Romeijn; Ehsan Salari
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  From analytic inversion to contemporary IMRT optimization: radiation therapy planning revisited from a mathematical perspective.

Authors:  Yair Censor; Jan Unkelbach
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  Robotic ultrasound-guided SBRT of the prostate: feasibility with respect to plan quality.

Authors:  Stefan Gerlach; Ivo Kuhlemann; Philipp Jauer; Ralf Bruder; Floris Ernst; Christoph Fürweger; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Enzhuo M Quan; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; Xiaochun Wang; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jennifer L Johnson; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Comparison of non-coplanar optimization of static beams and arc trajectories for intensity-modulated treatments of meningioma cases.

Authors:  Tiago Ventura; Humberto Rocha; Brigida da Costa Ferreira; Joana Dias; Maria do Carmo Lopes
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-07

8.  Multicriteria optimization informed VMAT planning.

Authors:  Huixiao Chen; David L Craft; David P Gierga
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.482

9.  Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marius Treutwein; Matthias Hipp; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Two-step intensity modulated arc therapy (2-step IMAT) with segment weight and width optimization.

Authors:  Jidi Sun; Theam Yong Chew; Juergen Meyer
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.