Literature DB >> 29167293

Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Has No Effect on Time to Positivity and Proportion of Positive Samples: a Cohort Study of 64 Cutibacterium acnes Bone and Joint Infections.

Alexia Anagnostopoulos1, Daniel A Bossard1, Bruno Ledergerber1, Patrick O Zingg2, Annelies S Zinkernagel1, Christian Gerber2, Yvonne Achermann3.   

Abstract

If a bone or joint infection is suspected, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is frequently withheld until intraoperative microbiological sampling has been performed. This practice builds upon the hypothesis that perioperative antibiotics could render culture results negative and thus impede tailored antibiotic treatment of infections. We aimed to assess the influence of antibiotic prophylaxis within 30 to 60 min before surgery on time to positivity of microbiological samples and on proportion of positive samples in Cutibacterium acnes bone and joint infections. Patients with at least one sample positive for C. acnes between January 2005 and December 2015 were included and classified as having an "infection" if at least 2 samples were positive; otherwise they were considered to have a sample "contamination." Kaplan-Meier curves were used to illustrate time to culture positivity. We found 64 cases with a C. acnes infection and 46 classified as having a C. acnes contamination. Application of perioperative prophylaxis significantly differed between the infection and contamination groups (72.8% versus 55.8%; P < 0.001). Within the infection group, we found no difference in time to positivity between those who had or had not received a perioperative prophylaxis (7.07 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.4 to 7.7, versus 7.11 days; 95% CI, 6.8 to 7.5; P = 0.3). Also, there was no association between the proportion of sample positivity and the application of perioperative prophylaxis (71.6% versus 65.9%; P = 0.39). Since perioperative prophylaxis did not negatively influence the microbiological yield in C. acnes infections, antibiotic prophylaxis can be routinely given to avoid surgical site infections.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cutibacterium acnes; Propionibacterium acnes; biofilm; intraoperative diagnostic; joint infection; osteomyelitis; perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29167293      PMCID: PMC5786710          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01576-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  24 in total

Review 1.  Device-associated infections: a macroproblem that starts with microadherence.

Authors:  R O Darouiche
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-26       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Preventing surgical site infections.

Authors:  Ilker Uçkay; Stephan Harbarth; Robin Peter; Daniel Lew; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection.

Authors:  D C Classen; R S Evans; S L Pestotnik; S D Horn; R L Menlove; J P Burke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prophylactic antibiotics do not affect cultures in the treatment of an infected TKA: a prospective trial.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Ajay Aggarwal; Stephanie A Givens; J Thomas McClure; Patrick M Morgan; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Antimicrobial Tolerance in Biofilms.

Authors:  Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-06

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Keith M Olsen; Trish M Perl; Paul G Auwaerter; Maureen K Bolon; Douglas N Fish; Lena M Napolitano; Robert G Sawyer; Douglas Slain; James P Steinberg; Robert A Weinstein
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.150

7.  Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in prosthetic joint infections: not a concern for intraoperative cultures.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; María E Portillo; Lluís Puig-Verdié; Albert Alier; Carlo Gamba; Pau Guirro; Santos Martínez-Díaz; Juan P Horcajada; Andrej Trampuz; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.803

8.  Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  B L Atkins; N Athanasou; J J Deeks; D W Crook; H Simpson; T E Peto; P McLardy-Smith; A R Berendt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Immunoproteomic Identification of In Vivo-Produced Propionibacterium acnes Proteins in a Rabbit Biofilm Infection Model.

Authors:  Yvonne Achermann; Bao Tran; Misun Kang; Janette M Harro; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2015-02-18

Review 10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for wound infections in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  B AlBuhairan; D Hind; A Hutchinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Radiological changes, infections and neurological complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: Part II.

Authors:  Marko Nabergoj; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin; Rihard Trebše; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

2.  Cutibacterium acnes Biofilm Study during Bone Cells Interaction.

Authors:  Céline Mongaret; Jennifer Varin-Simon; Fabien Lamret; Taghrid S El-Mahdy; Lucien Brasme; Véronique Vernet-Garnier; Sophie C Gangloff; Xavier Ohl; Fany Reffuveille
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-09-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.