Literature DB >> 19073373

The reliability of determining "leg dominant pain".

Eugene K Wai1, Kelly Howse, J Whitcomb Pollock, Holly Dornan, Liisa Vexler, Simon Dagenais.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients with back dominant pain generally have a worse prognosis after spine surgery when compared with patients with leg dominant pain. Despite the importance of determining whether patients with lumbar spine pain have back or leg dominant pain as a predictor for success after decompression surgery, there are limited data on the reliability of methods for doing so.
PURPOSE: To assess the test-retest reliability of a patient's ability to describe whether their lumbar spine pain is leg or back dominant using standardized questions. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Prospective, blinded, test-retest cohort study performed in an academic spinal surgery clinic. PATIENT SAMPLE: Consecutive patients presenting for consultation to one of three spinal surgeons for lumbar spine pain were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Eight questions to ascertain a patient's dominant location of pain, either back dominant or leg dominant, were identified from the literature and local experts.
METHODS: These eight questions were administered in a test-retest format over two weeks. The test-retest reliability of these questions were assessed in a self-administered questionnaire format for one group of patients and by a trained interviewer in a second group.
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability of each question ranged from substantial (eg, interviewer-administered percent question, weighted kappa=0.77) to slight (eg, self-administered pain diagram, weighted kappa=0.09). The Percent question was the most reliable in both groups (self-administered, interviewer). All questions in the interviewer-administered group were significantly (p<.001) more reliable than the self-administered group. Depending on the question, between 0% and 32% of patients provided a completely opposite response on test-retest. There was variability in prevalence of leg dominant pain, depending on which question was asked and there was no single question that identified all patients with leg dominant pain.
CONCLUSION: A patient's ability to identify whether his or her lumbar spine pain is leg or back dominant may be unreliable and depends on which questions are asked, and also how they are asked. The Percent question is the most reliable method to determine the dominant location of pain. However, given the variability of responses and the generally poorer reliability of many specific questions, it is recommended that multiple methods be used to assess a patient's dominant location of pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19073373     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  8 in total

1.  Validity of a single-item measure to assess leg or back pain as the predominant symptom in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A F Mannion; U M Mutter; T F Fekete; F Porchet; D Jeszenszky; F S Kleinstück
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The outcome of decompression surgery for lumbar herniated disc is influenced by the level of concomitant preoperative low back pain.

Authors:  F S Kleinstueck; T Fekete; D Jeszenszky; A F Mannion; D Grob; F Lattig; U Mutter; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  To fuse or not to fuse in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: do baseline symptoms help provide the answer?

Authors:  F S Kleinstueck; T F Fekete; A F Mannion; D Grob; F Porchet; U Mutter; D Jeszenszky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Evaluation of an advanced-practice physiotherapist in triaging patients with lumbar spine pain: surgeon-physiotherapist level of agreement and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Susan Robarts; Paul Stratford; Deborah Kennedy; Barry Malcolm; Joel Finkelstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Significant other interactions in people with chronic low back pain: Subgrouping and multidimensional profiles.

Authors:  Martin Rabey; Brendan Buldo; Magnus Duesund Helland; Courtenay Pang; Michelle Kendell; Darren Beales
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2021-12-27

6.  Potential triaging of referrals for lumbar spinal surgery consultation: a comparison of referral accuracy from pain specialists, findings from advanced imaging and a 3-item questionnaire.

Authors:  David Simon; Matt Coyle; Simon Dagenais; Joseph O'Neil; Eugene K Wai
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Do preoperative clinical and radiographic characteristics impact patient outcomes following one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based upon presenting symptoms?

Authors:  Kyle W Morse; Ram K Alluri; Avani S Vaishnav; Hikari Urakawa; Jung Kee Mok; Sohrab S Virk; Evan D Sheha; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Patients With Mild Leg Pain Levels Is Associated With Unsatisfactory Outcome.

Authors:  Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Anders Möller; Fredrik Strömqvist
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.