Literature DB >> 19071233

Cellular responses to targeted genomic sequence modification using single-stranded oligonucleotides and zinc-finger nucleases.

Petter Angell Olsen1, Anita Solhaug, James Alexander Booth, Monika Gelazauskaite, Stefan Krauss.   

Abstract

Single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssODNs) and zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs) are two approaches that are being pursued to achieve sequence specific genome modification. ZFNs induce high rates of homologous recombination (HR) between the target sequence and a given donor by introducing site-specific genomic double-strand breaks (DSBs). The mode of action that is used by ssODNs remains largely unknown, but may involve genomic integration of the ssODNs. In this work, cellular responses following ssODN and ZFN mediated correction of a genomic reporter gene have been investigated in human cells. Comparison of the cell cycle distribution of corrected cells following ssODN or ZFN exposure, established that ssODN corrected cells were arrested in the late S and G2/M cell cycle phases, while ZFN corrected cells displayed normal cell cycle profiles. We demonstrate that after ssODN mediated gene correction, phosphorylation of the damage sensor protein H2AX could be observed in 5.8% and 29% of the corrected cells, using a single copy and a multi copy reporter, respectively. When using the ZFN strategy in a single copy reporter only 1.5% of the corrected cells were positive for gamma-H2AX staining. By direct detection of genomic DSBs we establish that the observed cell cycle arrest following ssODN mediated gene correction could be associated with the presence of unrepaired genomic DSBs. Lastly, we establish that although a mutant cellular mismatch repair (MMR) system as expected enhanced ssODN mediated gene correction, the capacity of the ssODN corrected cells to proliferate was not influenced by the MMR system. In conclusion gene correction by means of the ssODN strategy leads to activation of DNA damage signalling and cell cycle arrest due to formation of unrepaired genomic DSBs in a high proportion of the corrected cells. On the contrary, cells corrected using ZFNs displayed normal cell cycle distribution and lower rates of DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19071233     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  17 in total

1.  A time-invariant principle of genome evolution.

Authors:  Subhajyoti De; M Madan Babu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Oligodeoxynucleotide binding to (CTG) · (CAG) microsatellite repeats inhibits replication fork stalling, hairpin formation, and genome instability.

Authors:  Guoqi Liu; Xiaomi Chen; Michael Leffak
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Oligo/polynucleotide-based gene modification: strategies and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  R Geoffrey Sargent; Soya Kim; Dieter C Gruenert
Journal:  Oligonucleotides       Date:  2011-03-21

4.  Analysis of illegitimate genomic integration mediated by zinc-finger nucleases: implications for specificity of targeted gene correction.

Authors:  Petter A Olsen; Monika Gelazauskaite; Markus Randøl; Stefan Krauss
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 2.946

5.  Oligonucleotide delivery by nucleofection does not rescue the reduced proliferation phenotype of gene-edited cells.

Authors:  Paula Livingston; Bryan Strouse; Haley Perry; Mandula Borjigin; Pawel Bialk; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.486

6.  High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Fuqiang Chen; Shondra M Pruett-Miller; Yuping Huang; Monika Gjoka; Katarzyna Duda; Jack Taunton; Trevor N Collingwood; Morten Frodin; Gregory D Davis
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 7.  An update on targeted gene repair in mammalian cells: methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Nanna M Jensen; Trine Dalsgaard; Maria Jakobsen; Roni R Nielsen; Charlotte B Sørensen; Lars Bolund; Thomas G Jensen
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 8.410

8.  DNA damage response pathway and replication fork stress during oligonucleotide directed gene editing.

Authors:  Melissa Bonner; Bryan Strouse; Mindy Applegate; Paula Livingston; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 10.183

Review 9.  Insights into the regenerative property of plant cells and their receptivity to transgenesis: wheat as a research case study.

Authors:  Fabienne Delporte; Jean-Marie Jacquemin; Patrick Masson; Bernard Watillon
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-10-16

10.  Transformation with oligonucleotides creating clustered changes in the yeast genome.

Authors:  Gina P Rodriguez; Joseph B Song; Gray F Crouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.