Literature DB >> 19070243

A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams.

Narayan Sahoo1, X Ronald Zhu, Bijan Arjomandy, George Ciangaru, MingFwu Lii, Richard Amos, Richard Wu, Michael T Gillin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to validate a monitor unit (MU) calculation procedure for passively scattered proton therapy beams. The output dose per MU (d/MU) of a therapeutic radiation beam is traditionally calibrated under specific reference conditions. These conditions include beam energy, field size, suitable depth in water or water equivalent phantom in a low dose gradient region with known relative depth dose, and source to point of calibration distance. Treatment field settings usually differ from these reference conditions leading to a different d/MU that needs to be determined for delivering the prescribed dose. For passively scattered proton beams, the proton specific parameters, which need to be defined, are related to the energy, lateral scatterers, range modulating wheel, spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) width, thickness of any range shifter, the depth dose value relative to the normalization point in the SOBP, and scatter both from the range compensator and inhomogeneity in the patient. Following the custom for photons or electrons, a set of proton dosimetry factors, representing the changes in the d/MU relative to a reference condition, can be defined as the relative output factor (ROF), SOBP factor (SOBPF), range shifter factor (RSF), SOBP off-center factor (SOBPOCF), off-center ratio (OCR), inverse square factor (ISF), field size factor (FSF), and compensator and patient scatter factor (CPSF). The ROF, SOBPF, and RSF are the major contributors to the d/MU and were measured using an ion chamber in water tank during the clinical commissioning of each beam to create a dosimetry beam data table to be used for calculating the monitor units. The following simple formula is found to provide an independent method to determine the d/MU at the point of interest (POI) in the patient, namely, (d/MU) = ROF SOBPF. RSF SOBPOCF.OCR.FSF.ISF.CPSF. The monitor units for delivering the intended dose (D) to the POI can be obtained from MU = D / (d/MU). The accuracy and robustness of the above formula were validated by calculating the d/MU in water for many different combinations of beam parameters and comparing it with the corresponding measured d/MU by an ion chamber in a water or water/plastic phantom. This procedure has been in use for MU calculation for patient treatment fields at our facility since May 2006. The differences in the calculated and measured values of the d/MU for 623 distinct fields used for patient treatment during the period of May 2006 to February 2007 are within 2% for 99% of these fields. The authors conclude that an intuitive formula similar to the one used for monitor unit calculation of therapeutic photon beams can be used to compute the monitor units of passively scattered proton therapy beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19070243     DOI: 10.1118/1.2992055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter.

Authors:  James R Kerns; Stephen F Kry; Narayan Sahoo; David S Followill; Geoffrey S Ibbott
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.

Authors:  Steven J Frank; James D Cox; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Jan S Lewin; Mark F Munsell; Matthew B Palmer; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury.

Authors:  Daphne Haas-Kogan; Daniel Indelicato; Harald Paganetti; Natia Esiashvili; Anita Mahajan; Torunn Yock; Stella Flampouri; Shannon MacDonald; Maryam Fouladi; Kry Stephen; John Kalapurakal; Stephanie Terezakis; Hanne Kooy; David Grosshans; Mike Makrigiorgos; Kavita Mishra; Tina Young Poussaint; Kenneth Cohen; Thomas Fitzgerald; Vinai Gondi; Arthur Liu; Jeff Michalski; Dragan Mirkovic; Radhe Mohan; Stephanie Perkins; Kenneth Wong; Bhadrasain Vikram; Jeff Buchsbaum; Larry Kun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Clinical Implementation of a Proton Dose Verification System Utilizing a GPU Accelerated Monte Carlo Engine.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; H Wan Chan Tseung; Kurt E Augustine; Martin Bues; Daniel W Mundy; Timothy J Walsh; Michael G Herman; Nadia N Laack
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Kenji Hotta; Ryosuke Kohno; Kohsuke Nagafuchi; Hidenori Yamaguchi; Ryohei Tansho; Yoshihisa Takada; Tetsuo Akimoto
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Comparability of three output prediction models for a compact passively double-scattered proton therapy system.

Authors:  Sven Ferguson; Yong Chen; Clara Ferreira; Mohammad Islam; Vance P Keeling; Andy Lau; Salahuddin Ahmad; Hosang Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Investigation on Patient/Compensator Scatter Factor for Monitor Unit Calculation in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Michael T Prusator; Salahuddin Ahmad; Yong Chen
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-11-30

8.  Dosimetric Characteristics of a Two-Dimensional Diode Array Detector Irradiated with Passively Scattered Proton Beams.

Authors:  Praimakorn Liengsawangwong; Nanayan Sahoo; Xiaoning Ding; MingFwu Lii; Michale T Gillin; Xiaorong Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Implementation of an improved dose-per-MU model for double-scattered proton beams to address interbeamline modulation width variability.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; JiaJian Shen; Christopher G Ainsley; Timothy D Solberg; James E McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Prediction of the output factor using machine and deep learning approach in uniform scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Hardev S Grewal; Michael S Chacko; Salahuddin Ahmad; Hosang Jin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.