Literature DB >> 24980943

Culturable bacterial diversity from a feed water of a reverse osmosis system, evaluation of biofilm formation and biocontrol using phages.

D R B Belgini1, R S Dias, V M Siqueira, L A B Valadares, J M Albanese, R S Souza, A P R Torres, M P Sousa, C C Silva, S O De Paula, V M Oliveira.   

Abstract

Biofilm formation on reverse osmosis (RO) systems represents a drawback in the application of this technology by different industries, including oil refineries. In RO systems the feed water maybe a source of microbial contamination and thus contributes for the formation of biofilm and consequent biofouling. In this study the planktonic culturable bacterial community was characterized from a feed water of a RO system and their capacities were evaluated to form biofilm in vitro. Bacterial motility and biofilm control were also analysed using phages. As results, diverse Protobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were identified. Alphaproteobacteria was the predominant group and Brevundimonas, Pseudomonas and Mycobacterium the most abundant genera. Among the 30 isolates, 11 showed at least one type of motility and 11 were classified as good biofilm formers. Additionally, the influence of non-specific bacteriophage in the bacterial biofilms formed in vitro was investigated by action of phages enzymes or phage infection. The vB_AspP-UFV1 (Podoviridae) interfered in biofilm formation of most tested bacteria and may represent a good alternative in biofilm control. These findings provide important information about the bacterial community from the feed water of a RO system that may be used for the development of strategies for biofilm prevention and control in such systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24980943     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-014-1693-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  63 in total

1.  Sphingomonas alaskensis strain AFO1, an abundant oligotrophic ultramicrobacterium from the North Pacific.

Authors:  M Eguchi; M Ostrowski; F Fegatella; J Bowman; D Nichols; T Nishino; R Cavicchioli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Biofilm formation as microbial development.

Authors:  G O'Toole; H B Kaplan; R Kolter
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 3.  Biofilms as complex differentiated communities.

Authors:  P Stoodley; K Sauer; D G Davies; J W Costerton
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Screening and isolation of halophilic bacteria producing extracellular hydrolyses from Howz Soltan Lake, Iran.

Authors:  R Rohban; Mohammad Ali Amoozegar; A Ventosa
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Biofilm formation on reverse osmosis membranes is initiated and dominated by Sphingomonas spp.

Authors:  L A Bereschenko; A J M Stams; G J W Euverink; M C M van Loosdrecht
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Initiation of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 57RP correlates with emergence of hyperpiliated and highly adherent phenotypic variants deficient in swimming, swarming, and twitching motilities.

Authors:  E Déziel; Y Comeau; R Villemur
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Biofilm susceptibility to bacteriophage attack: the role of phage-borne polysaccharide depolymerase.

Authors:  Kevin A Hughes; Ian W Sutherland; Martin V Jones
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  The T7-related Pseudomonas putida phage φ15 displays virion-associated biofilm degradation properties.

Authors:  Anneleen Cornelissen; Pieter-Jan Ceyssens; Jeroen T'Syen; Helena Van Praet; Jean-Paul Noben; Olga V Shaburova; Victor N Krylov; Guido Volckaert; Rob Lavigne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cultured and uncultured microbial community associated with biogas production in anaerobic digestion processes.

Authors:  Júlia Ronzella Ottoni; Suzan Prado Fernandes Bernal; Tiago Joelzer Marteres; Franciele Natividade Luiz; Viviane Piccin Dos Santos; Ângelo Gabriel Mari; Juliana Gaio Somer; Valéria Maia de Oliveira; Michel Rodrigo Zambrano Passarini
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.552

2.  Can Aggregate-Associated Organisms Influence the Fouling in a SWRO Desalination Plant?

Authors:  Tamar Jamieson; Harriet Whiley; Jason R Gascooke; Sophie C Leterme
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 3.  Ecology of Anti-Biofilm Agents II: Bacteriophage Exploitation and Biocontrol of Biofilm Bacteria.

Authors:  Stephen T Abedon
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-09

4.  Genomic analysis and immune response in a murine mastitis model of vB_EcoM-UFV13, a potential biocontrol agent for use in dairy cows.

Authors:  Vinícius da Silva Duarte; Roberto Sousa Dias; Andrew M Kropinski; Stefano Campanaro; Laura Treu; Carolina Siqueira; Marcella Silva Vieira; Isabela da Silva Paes; Gabriele Rocha Santana; Franciele Martins; Josicelli Souza Crispim; André da Silva Xavier; Camila Geovana Ferro; Pedro M P Vidigal; Cynthia Canêdo da Silva; Sérgio Oliveira de Paula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Isolation and characterization of Sphingomonadaceae from fouled membranes.

Authors:  Hendrik J de Vries; Florian Beyer; Monika Jarzembowska; Joanna Lipińska; Paula van den Brink; Arie Zwijnenburg; Peer H A Timmers; Alfons J M Stams; Caroline M Plugge
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 7.290

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.