Literature DB >> 19067471

Efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine in patients with moderate to severe hypertension after amlodipine monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study.

Massimo Volpe1, Peter Brommer, Uwe Haag, Cristina Miele.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cerebrovascular and cardiac adverse events can be significantly reduced by effective antihypertensive therapy; however, BP control rates remain poor. The objective of this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study was to determine the efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine combination therapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension who had failed to respond to treatment with 8 weeks of open-label amlodipine.
METHODS: A total of 1017 patients entered the open-label amlodipine monotherapy stage; mean BP at week 0 was 164/102 mmHg. After 8 weeks of amlodipine monotherapy (5 mg/day), non-responding patients (n = 755) were randomized to receive placebo plus amlodipine 5 mg or a combination of olmesartan medoxomil (10-40 mg) with amlodipine 5 mg for 8 weeks. At week 16, patients who had achieved diastolic BP (DBP) <90 mmHg and/or systolic BP (SBP) <140 mmHg continued on randomized treatment for a further 8 weeks. Patients in whom both SBP and DBP were >or=140/90 mmHg at week 16 had their medication uptitrated to olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 20/5 mg, olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 40/5 mg or olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 40/10 mg.
RESULTS: Combination of olmesartan medoxomil (10-40 mg) with amlodipine 5 mg for 8 weeks (double-blind) reduced mean SBP/DBP by up to 16.8 mmHg and 9.6 mmHg, respectively. The additional adjusted mean change in seated DBP (SeDBP) [primary endpoint] with last observation carried forward (LOCF) compared with placebo/amlodipine 5 mg was -2.0 mmHg (p = 0.0207), -3.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001) and -3.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001) for olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 10/5 mg, 20/5 mg and 40/5 mg, respectively. The corresponding additional adjusted mean change in SeSBP compared with placebo/amlodipine 5 mg was -3.5 mmHg (p = 0.0103), -5.8 mmHg (p < 0.0001) and -7.1 mmHg (p < 0.0001) for the olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine 10/5 mg, 20/5 mg and 40/5 mg groups, respectively. Uptitration was associated with further mean reductions of up to 12.6 mmHg (SeSBP) and 8.2 mmHg (SeDBP), and allowed additional patients to achieve goal BP. Target BP was defined using both SBP and DBP criteria (patients without diabetes <140/90 mmHg; patients with diabetes <130/80 mmHg). More than 70% of patients on active combination therapy achieved their BP goal by week 24. All combination regimens were well tolerated.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that olmesartan medoxomil combined with amlodipine is effective and well tolerated in reducing BP in patients with moderate to severe hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19067471     DOI: 10.2165/0044011-200929010-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  25 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based management of hypertension. Cardiovascular risk factors and their effects on the decision to treat hypertension: evidence based review.

Authors:  R Padwal; S E Straus; F A McAlister
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

2.  Success and predictors of blood pressure control in diverse North American settings: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT).

Authors:  William C Cushman; Charles E Ford; Jeffrey A Cutler; Karen L Margolis; Barry R Davis; Richard H Grimm; Henry R Black; Bruce P Hamilton; Joanne Holland; Chuke Nwachuku; Vasilios Papademetriou; Jeffery Probstfield; Jackson T Wright; Michael H Alderman; Robert J Weiss; Linda Piller; Judy Bettencourt; Sandra M Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Renata Cifkova; Robert Fagard; Giuseppe Germano; Guido Grassi; Anthony M Heagerty; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stephane Laurent; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Luis Ruilope; Andrzej Rynkiewicz; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker Boudier; Alberto Zanchetti; Alec Vahanian; John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Funck-Brentano; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; José Luis Zamorano; Serap Erdine; Wolfgang Kiowski; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Lars H Lindholm; Margus Viigimaa; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Vicente Bertomeu; Denis Clement; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Dan Gaita; Gregory Lip; Jean-Michel Mallion; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Eoin O'Brien; Piotr Ponikowski; Josep Redon; Frank Ruschitzka; Juan Tamargo; Pieter van Zwieten; Bernard Waeber; Bryan Williams
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.844

4.  Baseline Characteristics and Early Blood Pressure Control in the CONVINCE Trial.

Authors:  Henry R. Black; William J. Elliott; James D. Neaton; Gregory Grandits; Patricia Grambsch; Richard H. Grimm; Lennart Hansson; Yves Lacoucière; James Muller; Peter Sleight; Michael A. Weber; William B. White; Gordon Williams; Janet Wittes; Alberto Zanchetti; T. Daniel Fakouhi; Robert J. Anders
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in patients uncontrolled with telmisartan monotherapy.

Authors:  Y Lacourcière; R Tytus; D O'Keefe; J Lenis; R Orchard; K Martin
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 6.  Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks. US population data.

Authors:  J Stamler; R Stamler; J D Neaton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-08

7.  Hypertension treatment and control in five European countries, Canada, and the United States.

Authors:  Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; Holly Kramer; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Michel R Joffres; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Blood pressure control in Italy: results of recent surveys on hypertension.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Giuliano Tocci; Bruno Trimarco; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Claudio Borghi; Ettore Ambrosioni; Alessandro Menotti; Alberto Zanchetti; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  The combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure: COACH, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week factorial efficacy and safety study.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant; Michael Melino; Sulekha Karki; James Lee; Reinilde Heyrman
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.393

10.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias.

Authors:  S MacMahon; R Peto; J Cutler; R Collins; P Sorlie; J Neaton; R Abbott; J Godwin; A Dyer; J Stamler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  38 in total

1.  Moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne Oparil; Thomas Giles; Elizabeth O Ofili; Bertram Pitt; Yodit Seifu; Robert Hilkert; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  Use of Angiotensin receptor blockers in cardiovascular protection: current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Mark A Munger
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-01

3.  Antihypertensive response to combination of olmesartan and amlodipine does not depend on method and time of drug administration.

Authors:  Francesco Rozza; Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Mario Santoro; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina Marino; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-05-09

4.  Younger females are at greater risk of vasodilation-related adverse symptoms caused by dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: results of a study of 11,918 Japanese patients.

Authors:  Ayami Kajiwara; Junji Saruwatari; Ayana Kita; Kentaro Oniki; Masato Yamamura; Motoji Murase; Haruo Koda; Seisuke Hirota; Tadao Ishizuka; Kazuko Nakagawa
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Calcium Channel Blockers for the Clinical Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2017-10-11

Review 6.  Hydrochlorothiazide versus calcium channel blockers: what is the best add-on to a renin-angiotensin system blocker for treating hypertension in patients with renal disease?

Authors:  Edgar V Lerma
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Efficacy and safety of triple antihypertensive therapy with the olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combination.

Authors:  Massimo Volpe; Lars Christian Rump; Bettina Ammentorp; Petra Laeis
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Role of olmesartan in combination therapy in blood pressure control and vascular function.

Authors:  Carlos M Ferrario; Ronald D Smith
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-09-07

Review 9.  Olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine.

Authors:  Mark Sanford; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of adding an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to a calcium channel blocker (CCB) following ineffective CCB monotherapy.

Authors:  Jin Ma; Xiao-Yan Wang; Zhi-De Hu; Zhi-Rui Zhou; Paul Schoenhagen; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.