OBJECT: Define MR quality assurance procedures for maximal PASADENA hyperpolarization of a biological (13)C molecular imaging reagent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An automated PASADENA polarizer and a parahydrogen generator were installed. (13)C enriched hydroxyethyl acrylate, 1-(13)C, 2,3,3-d(3) (HEA), was converted to hyperpolarized hydroxyethyl propionate, 1-(13)C, 2,3,3-d(3) (HEP) and fumaric acid, 1-(13)C, 2,3-d(2) (FUM) to hyperpolarized succinic acid, 1-(13)C, 2,3-d(2) (SUC), by reaction with parahydrogen and norbornadiene rhodium catalyst. Incremental optimization of successive steps in PASADENA was implemented. MR spectra and in vivo images of hyperpolarized (13)C imaging agents were acquired at 1.5 and 4.7 T. RESULTS: Application of quality assurance (QA) criteria resulted in incremental optimization of the individual steps in PASADENA implementation. Optimal hyperpolarization of HEP of P = 20% was achieved by calibration of the NMR unit of the polarizer (B (0) field strength +/- 0.002 mT). Mean hyperpolarization of SUC, P = [15.3 +/- 1.9]% (N = 16) in D (2)O, and P = [12.8 +/- 3.1]% (N = 12) in H (2)O, was achieved every 5-8 min (range 13-20%). An in vivo (13)C succinate image of a rat was produced. CONCLUSION: PASADENA spin hyperpolarization of SUC to 15.3% in average was demonstrated (37,400 fold signal enhancement at 4.7 T). The biological fate of (13)C succinate, a normally occurring cellular intermediate, might be monitored with enhanced sensitivity.
OBJECT: Define MR quality assurance procedures for maximal PASADENA hyperpolarization of a biological (13)C molecular imaging reagent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An automated PASADENA polarizer and a parahydrogen generator were installed. (13)C enriched hydroxyethyl acrylate, 1-(13)C, 2,3,3-d(3) (HEA), was converted to hyperpolarized hydroxyethyl propionate, 1-(13)C, 2,3,3-d(3) (HEP) and fumaric acid, 1-(13)C, 2,3-d(2) (FUM) to hyperpolarized succinic acid, 1-(13)C, 2,3-d(2) (SUC), by reaction with parahydrogen and norbornadiene rhodium catalyst. Incremental optimization of successive steps in PASADENA was implemented. MR spectra and in vivo images of hyperpolarized (13)C imaging agents were acquired at 1.5 and 4.7 T. RESULTS: Application of quality assurance (QA) criteria resulted in incremental optimization of the individual steps in PASADENA implementation. Optimal hyperpolarization of HEP of P = 20% was achieved by calibration of the NMR unit of the polarizer (B (0) field strength +/- 0.002 mT). Mean hyperpolarization of SUC, P = [15.3 +/- 1.9]% (N = 16) in D (2)O, and P = [12.8 +/- 3.1]% (N = 12) in H (2)O, was achieved every 5-8 min (range 13-20%). An in vivo (13)C succinate image of a rat was produced. CONCLUSION: PASADENA spin hyperpolarization of SUC to 15.3% in average was demonstrated (37,400 fold signal enhancement at 4.7 T). The biological fate of (13)C succinate, a normally occurring cellular intermediate, might be monitored with enhanced sensitivity.
Authors: P Bhattacharya; K Harris; A P Lin; M Mansson; V A Norton; W H Perman; D P Weitekamp; B D Ross Journal: MAGMA Date: 2005-11-23 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Pratip Bhattacharya; Eduard Y Chekmenev; William H Perman; Kent C Harris; Alexander P Lin; Valerie A Norton; Chou T Tan; Brian D Ross; Daniel P Weitekamp Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2007-01-30 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Eduard Y Chekmenev; Jan Hövener; Valerie A Norton; Kent Harris; Lynne S Batchelder; Pratip Bhattacharya; Brian D Ross; Daniel P Weitekamp Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Niki M Zacharias; Henry R Chan; Napapon Sailasuta; Brian D Ross; Pratip Bhattacharya Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: William H Perman; Pratip Bhattacharya; Jochen Leupold; Alexander P Lin; Kent C Harris; Valerie A Norton; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Brian D Ross Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: K V Kovtunov; D A Barskiy; O G Salnikov; R V Shchepin; A M Coffey; L M Kovtunova; V I Bukhtiyarov; I V Koptyug; E Y Chekmenev Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 3.361
Authors: Kirill V Kovtunov; Ekaterina V Pokochueva; Oleg G Salnikov; Samuel F Cousin; Dennis Kurzbach; Basile Vuichoud; Sami Jannin; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Boyd M Goodson; Danila A Barskiy; Igor V Koptyug Journal: Chem Asian J Date: 2018-05-23
Authors: Milton L Truong; Aaron M Coffey; Roman V Shchepin; Kevin W Waddell; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Jason Graham Skinner; Luca Menichetti; Alessandra Flori; Anna Dost; Andreas Benjamin Schmidt; Markus Plaumann; Ferdia Aiden Gallagher; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Robert Borowiak; Niels Schwaderlapp; Frank Huethe; Thomas Lickert; Elmar Fischer; Sébastien Bär; Jürgen Hennig; Dominik von Elverfeldt; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Oleg G Salnikov; Roman V Shchepin; Nikita V Chukanov; Lamya Jaigirdar; Wellington Pham; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Thomas Theis; Nuwandi M Ariyasingha; Roman V Shchepin; Jacob R Lindale; Warren S Warren; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 6.475