Literature DB >> 19065138

Are adverse outcomes associated with assisted reproduction related to the technology or couples' subfertility?

Michael Ludwig1.   

Abstract

This commentary discusses a paper by Romundstad and colleagues, who aimed to determine whether the adverse affects associated with assisted reproduction are a result of the technology or couples' infertility. The study used data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway from January 1984 to June 2006, and analyzed the outcomes of the whole population, and of sibling pairs where one sibling was conceived by assisted reproduction, and the other by spontaneous conception. The study showed that in the whole population, babies conceived via assisted reproduction experienced more adverse events than babies conceived via spontaneous conception. Among the sibling pairs, however, assisted reproduction was not associated with increased risk of low birth weight, premature delivery, small size for gestational age, or perinatal mortality. The results indicate that the adverse outcomes associated with assisted fertilization could be attributable to factors that lead to infertility and subfertility, rather than the reproductive technology. Follow-up studies should be performed to identify genes or other factors that lead to high risks of adverse events among subfertile couples, and these couples should be counselled about the increased risk of adverse events during and after pregnancies.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19065138     DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro1272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol        ISSN: 1743-4270


  7 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Frans M Helmerhorst; Denise A M Perquin; Diane Donker; Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23

Review 2.  Assisted reproduction: the epigenetic perspective.

Authors:  Bernhard Horsthemke; Michael Ludwig
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples.

Authors:  M Ludwig; A Katalinic; S Gross; A Sutcliffe; R Varon; B Horsthemke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic review.

Authors:  Michèle Hansen; Carol Bower; Elizabeth Milne; Nicholas de Klerk; Jennifer J Kurinczuk
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-11-26       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Liv Bente Romundstad; Pål R Romundstad; Arne Sunde; Vidar von Düring; Rolv Skjaerven; David Gunnell; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Outcome of assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Alastair G Sutcliffe; Michael Ludwig
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca A Jackson; Kimberly A Gibson; Yvonne W Wu; Mary S Croughan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  An evolutionary genomic approach to identify genes involved in human birth timing.

Authors:  Jevon Plunkett; Scott Doniger; Guilherme Orabona; Thomas Morgan; Ritva Haataja; Mikko Hallman; Hilkka Puttonen; Ramkumar Menon; Edward Kuczynski; Errol Norwitz; Victoria Snegovskikh; Aarno Palotie; Leena Peltonen; Vineta Fellman; Emily A DeFranco; Bimal P Chaudhari; Tracy L McGregor; Jude J McElroy; Matthew T Oetjens; Kari Teramo; Ingrid Borecki; Justin Fay; Louis Muglia
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.917

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.