PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the fourth leading cancer for women in the United States. Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS is imperfect. This article highlights the current knowledge base and the scientific roadmap needed to advance the field. METHODS: This article is based on work done by and consultations obtained from leading experts in the field over a 6-month period that culminated in a full-day symposium designed to systematically review the most pertinent MEDLINE published reports and develop a roadmap to elucidate the molecular steps of carcinogenesis, reduce the extent or prevent the need for therapies, eliminate recurrences, and reduce morbidity. RESULTS: Expression profiling of pure DCIS will help elucidate the molecular characteristics that distinguish high-risk lesions from clinically irrelevant lesions. The development of new methods of extracting RNA from processed tissues may provide opportunities for research. Mammography often underestimates the pathologic extent of DCIS; other imaging methods need to be investigated for detection and monitoring of disease stability or progression. Novel biologic agents are being delivered in neoadjuvant clinical trials, and alternative methods for breast irradiation are being studied. Future trials of treatment versus no treatment for biologically selected cases of DCIS should be developed. CONCLUSION: There is a critical need for a concerted international effort among patients with DCIS, clinicians, and basic scientists to conduct the research necessary to improve fundamental understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS and prevent development of invasive breast cancer.
PURPOSE:Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the fourth leading cancer for women in the United States. Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS is imperfect. This article highlights the current knowledge base and the scientific roadmap needed to advance the field. METHODS: This article is based on work done by and consultations obtained from leading experts in the field over a 6-month period that culminated in a full-day symposium designed to systematically review the most pertinent MEDLINE published reports and develop a roadmap to elucidate the molecular steps of carcinogenesis, reduce the extent or prevent the need for therapies, eliminate recurrences, and reduce morbidity. RESULTS: Expression profiling of pure DCIS will help elucidate the molecular characteristics that distinguish high-risk lesions from clinically irrelevant lesions. The development of new methods of extracting RNA from processed tissues may provide opportunities for research. Mammography often underestimates the pathologic extent of DCIS; other imaging methods need to be investigated for detection and monitoring of disease stability or progression. Novel biologic agents are being delivered in neoadjuvant clinical trials, and alternative methods for breast irradiation are being studied. Future trials of treatment versus no treatment for biologically selected cases of DCIS should be developed. CONCLUSION: There is a critical need for a concerted international effort among patients with DCIS, clinicians, and basic scientists to conduct the research necessary to improve fundamental understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of DCIS and prevent development of invasive breast cancer.
Authors: Stefano Volinia; Marco Galasso; Maria Elena Sana; Timothy F Wise; Jeff Palatini; Kay Huebner; Carlo M Croce Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Erik S Knudsen; Ornella Dervishaj; Celina G Kleer; Thomas Pajak; Gordon F Schwartz; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Rosalinda Alvarado; Sara A Lari; Robert E Roses; Benjamin D Smith; Wei Yang; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Banu K Arun; Anthony Lucci; Gildy V Babiera; Jamie L Wagner; Abigail S Caudle; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Rosa F Hwang; Isabelle Bedrosian; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Antonio Ponti; Elsebeth Lynge; Ted James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Maria Piera Mano; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Jacques Fracheboud; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; Nieves Ascunce; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Nereo Segnan; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen Taplin Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Elsebeth Lynge; Antonio Ponti; Ted James; Ondřej Májek; My von Euler-Chelpin; Ahti Anttila; Patricia Fitzpatrick; Alfonso Frigerio; Masaaki Kawai; Astrid Scharpantgen; Mireille Broeders; Solveig Hofvind; Carmen Vidal; Maria Ederra; Dolores Salas; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Mariano Tomatis; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen Taplin Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: K Graham; A de las Morenas; A Tripathi; C King; M Kavanah; J Mendez; M Stone; J Slama; M Miller; G Antoine; H Willers; P Sebastiani; C L Rosenberg Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-03-02 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Hitchintan Kaur; Shihong Mao; Seema Shah; David H Gorski; Stephen A Krawetz; Bonnie F Sloane; Raymond R Mattingly Journal: Expert Rev Mol Diagn Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.225
Authors: Lyndsey A Emery; Anusri Tripathi; Chialin King; Maureen Kavanah; Jane Mendez; Michael D Stone; Antonio de las Morenas; Paola Sebastiani; Carol L Rosenberg Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 4.307