BACKGROUND: Little is known about the genetic and epigenetic changes that contribute to familial pancreatic cancers. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of common genetic and epigenetic alterations in sporadic and familial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: DNA was isolated from the microdissected cancers of 39 patients with familial and 36 patients with sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. KRAS2 mutations were detected by BstN1 digestion and/or cycle sequencing. TP53 and SMAD4 status were determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of 23 archival familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas and in selected cases by cycle sequencing to identify TP53 gene mutations. Methylation-specific PCR analysis of seven genes (FoxE1, NPTX2, CLDN5, P16, TFPI-2, SPARC, ppENK) was done on a subset of fresh-frozen familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas. RESULTS: KRAS2 mutations were identified in 31 of 39 (80%) of the familial versus 28 of 36 (78%) of the sporadic pancreatic cancers. Positive immunolabeling for p53 was observed in 57% of the familial pancreatic cancers and loss of SMAD4 labeling was observed in 61% of the familial pancreatic cancers, rates similar to those observed in sporadic pancreatic cancers. The mean prevalence of aberrant methylation in the familial pancreatic cancers was 68.4%, which was not significantly different from that observed in sporadic pancreatic cancers. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of mutant KRAS2, inactivation of TP53 and SMAD4, and aberrant DNA methylation of a seven-gene panel is similar in familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas as in sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinomas. These findings support the use of markers of sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinomas to detect familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the genetic and epigenetic changes that contribute to familial pancreatic cancers. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of common genetic and epigenetic alterations in sporadic and familial pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. METHODS: DNA was isolated from the microdissected cancers of 39 patients with familial and 36 patients with sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. KRAS2 mutations were detected by BstN1 digestion and/or cycle sequencing. TP53 and SMAD4 status were determined by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays of 23 archival familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas and in selected cases by cycle sequencing to identify TP53 gene mutations. Methylation-specific PCR analysis of seven genes (FoxE1, NPTX2, CLDN5, P16, TFPI-2, SPARC, ppENK) was done on a subset of fresh-frozen familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas. RESULTS:KRAS2 mutations were identified in 31 of 39 (80%) of the familial versus 28 of 36 (78%) of the sporadic pancreatic cancers. Positive immunolabeling for p53 was observed in 57% of the familial pancreatic cancers and loss of SMAD4 labeling was observed in 61% of the familial pancreatic cancers, rates similar to those observed in sporadic pancreatic cancers. The mean prevalence of aberrant methylation in the familial pancreatic cancers was 68.4%, which was not significantly different from that observed in sporadic pancreatic cancers. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of mutant KRAS2, inactivation of TP53 and SMAD4, and aberrant DNA methylation of a seven-gene panel is similar in familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas as in sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinomas. These findings support the use of markers of sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinomas to detect familial pancreatic adenocarcinomas.
Authors: Norihiro Sato; Antony R Parker; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Yohei Miyagi; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; James R Eshleman; Michael Goggins Journal: Oncogene Date: 2005-01-27 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Suresh T Chari; Cynthia L Leibson; Kari G Rabe; Jeanine Ransom; Mariza de Andrade; Gloria M Petersen Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Erlinda E Embuscado; Daniel Laheru; Francesca Ricci; Ki Jung Yun; Sten de Boom Witzel; Allison Seigel; Katie Flickinger; Manuel Hidalgo; G Steven Bova; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2005-05-12 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Chanjuan Shi; Susan H Eshleman; Dana Jones; Noriyoshi Fukushima; Li Hua; Antony R Parker; Charles J Yeo; Ralph H Hruban; Michael G Goggins; James R Eshleman Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Marcia Canto; Norihiro Sato; Alison Klein; Tadayoshi Abe; Keishi Yamashita; Charles J Yeo; Anthony Kalloo; Ralph Hruban; Michael Goggins Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Seung-Mo Hong; Audrey Vincent; Mitsuro Kanda; Julie Leclerc; Noriyuki Omura; Michael Borges; Alison P Klein; Marcia Irene Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Haeryoung Kim; Burcu Saka; Spencer Knight; Michael Borges; Erica Childs; Alison Klein; Christopher Wolfgang; Joseph Herman; Volkan N Adsay; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Shanna A Arnold; Lee B Rivera; Andrew F Miller; Juliet G Carbon; Sean P Dineen; Yang Xie; Diego H Castrillon; E Helene Sage; Pauli Puolakkainen; Amy D Bradshaw; Rolf A Brekken Journal: Dis Model Mech Date: 2009-12-09 Impact factor: 5.758
Authors: Jun Gao; Jian Song; Haojie Huang; Zhaoshen Li; Yiqi Du; Jia Cao; Minghui Li; Shunli Lv; Han Lin; Yanfang Gong Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-26
Authors: Lee M Bass; Deepa Patil; M Sambasiva Rao; Richard M Green; Peter F Whitington Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 3.067