Literature DB >> 19064494

The quest for generalizations over consonants: asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences.

Juan M Toro1, Mohinish Shukla, Marina Nespor, Ansgar D Endress.   

Abstract

Consonants and vowels may play different roles during language processing, consonants being preferentially involved in lexical processing, and vowels tending to mark syntactic constituency through prosodic cues. In support of this view, artificial language learning studies have demonstrated that consonants (C) support statistical computations, whereas vowels (V) allow certain structural generalizations. Nevertheless, these asymmetries could be mere by-products of lower level acoustic differences between Cs and Vs, in particular the energy they carry, and thus their relative salience. Here we address this issue and show that vowels remain the preferred targets for generalizations, even when consonants are made highly salient or vowels barely audible. Participants listened to speech streams of nonsense CVCVCV words, in which consonants followed a simple ABA structure. Participants failed to generalize this structure over sonorant consonants (Experiment 1), even when vowel duration was reduced to one third of that of consonants (Experiment 2). When vowels were eliminated from the stream, participants showed only a marginal evidence of generalizations (Experiment 4). In contrast, participants readily generalized the structure over barely audible vowels (Experiment 3). These results show that different roles of consonants and vowels cannot be readily reduced to acoustical and perceptual differences between these phonetic categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064494     DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Perceptual contributions to monosyllabic word intelligibility: segmental, lexical, and noise replacement factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Newborn's brain activity signals the origin of word memories.

Authors:  Silvia Benavides-Varela; Jean-Rémy Hochmann; Francesco Macagno; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Influence of syllable structure on L2 auditory word learning.

Authors:  Megumi Hamada; Hideki Goya
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-04

5.  Bayesian learning and the psychology of rule induction.

Authors:  Ansgar D Endress
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-01

6.  Refining Stimulus Parameters in Assessing Infant Speech Perception Using Visual Reinforcement Infant Speech Discrimination in Infants with and without Hearing Loss: Presentation Level.

Authors:  Kristin M Uhler; René H Gifford; Jeri E Forster; Melinda Anderson; Elyse Tierney; Stacy D Claycomb; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Different ERP profiles for learning rules over consonants and vowels.

Authors:  Júlia Monte-Ordoño; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal.

Authors:  Daniela M de la Mora; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-10-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.