Literature DB >> 19064300

Biogenic U(IV) oxidation by dissolved oxygen and nitrate in sediment after prolonged U(VI)/Fe(III)/SO(4)(2-) reduction.

H S Moon1, J Komlos, P R Jaffé.   

Abstract

Sediment column experiments were performed to quantify the effect of biogenic iron sulfide precipitates on the stability of bioreduced uranium during and after a simulated bioremediation scenario. In particular, this study examined the effect of different oxidants (dissolved oxygen and nitrate) on biogenic U(IV) oxidation in sediment that experienced significant sulfate reduction in addition to Fe(III) and U(VI) reduction. The experimental set-up included five replicate columns (each 5 cm in diameter, 15 cm long and packed with background sediment from a site contaminated with uranium) that were bioreduced for 70 days by injecting a nutrient media containing 3 mM acetate and 6 mM sulfate prior to oxidation. Upon oxidation, iron sulfide precipitates formed during bioreduction acted as a buffer to partially prevent biogenic U(IV) oxidation. The iron sulfides were more effective at protecting biogenic U(IV) from oxidation when dissolved oxygen was the oxidant compared to nitrate. A constant supply of 0.25 mM and 1.6 mM nitrate over a 50 day period resulted in uranium resolubilization of 11% and 60%, respectively, while less than 1% of the uranium was resolubilized in the column supplied 0.27 mM dissolved oxygen during the same time period. Over time, oxidation increased pore water channeling, which was more pronounced during oxidation with nitrate. Increased channeling with time of oxidation could affect the transport of an oxidant through the previously reduced zone, and hence the oxidation dynamics of the reduced species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064300     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contam Hydrol        ISSN: 0169-7722            Impact factor:   3.188


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sulfate reduction in groundwater: characterization and applications for remediation.

Authors:  Z Miao; M L Brusseau; K C Carroll; C Carreón-Diazconti; B Johnson
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Uranium fate in wetland mesocosms: Effects of plants at two iron loadings with different pH values.

Authors:  Paul G Koster van Groos; Daniel I Kaplan; Hyun-Shik Chang; John C Seaman; Dien Li; Aaron D Peacock; Kirk G Scheckel; Peter R Jaffé
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Bacterial Community Shift and Coexisting/Coexcluding Patterns Revealed by Network Analysis in a Uranium-Contaminated Site after Bioreduction Followed by Reoxidation.

Authors:  Bing Li; Wei-Min Wu; David B Watson; Erick Cardenas; Yuanqing Chao; D H Phillips; Tonia Mehlhorn; Kenneth Lowe; Shelly D Kelly; Pengsong Li; Huchun Tao; James M Tiedje; Craig S Criddle; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  UO2 2+-mediated ring contraction of pyrihexaphyrin: synthesis of a contracted expanded porphyrin-uranyl complex.

Authors:  James T Brewster; Harrison D Root; Daniel Mangel; Adam Samia; Hadiqa Zafar; Adam C Sedgwick; Vincent M Lynch; Jonathan L Sessler
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Layers of Uranium Phosphate Nanorods and Nanoplates Encrusted on Fungus Cladosporium sp. Strain F1 Hyphae.

Authors:  Jisu Lee; Sue Jung Lee; Sungho Kim; Jong-Un Lee; Kwang-Soon Shin; Hor-Gil Hur
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.