Literature DB >> 19063681

Selective modification of bone quality by PTH, pamidronate, or raloxifene.

Tara C Brennan1, René Rizzoli, Patrick Ammann.   

Abstract

Bone strength, a determinant of resistance to fracture, depends on BMD, geometry, microarchitecture, bone turnover rates, and properties of the bone at the material level. Despite comparable antifracture efficacy, anti-catabolics and bone anabolic agents are likely to modify the various determinants of bone strength in very different ways. Eight weeks after ovariectomy (OVX), 8-mo-old osteoporotic rats received pamidronate (APD; 0.6 mg/kg, 5 days/mo, SC), raloxifene (3 mg/kg, 5/7 days, tube feeding), PTH(1-34) (10 mug/kg, 5/7 days, SC), or vehicle for 16 wk, and we measured vertebral BMD, maximal load, stiffness and energy, microarchitecture, and material properties by nanoindentation, which allows the calculation of the elastic modulus, tissue hardness, and working energy. Markers of bone turnover, plasma osteocalcin, and urinary deoxypyridinoline (Dpd) were also determined. PTH induced greater maximal load than APD or raloxifene, as well as greater absorbed energy, BMD, and increased bone turnover markers. PTH markedly increased trabecular bone volume and connectivity to values higher than sham. Animals treated with APD had BV/TV values significantly higher than OVX but lower than sham, whereas raloxifene had no effect. Tissue hardness was identical in PTH-treated and OVX untreated controls. In contrast, APD reversed the decline in strength to levels not significantly different to sham, reduced bone turnover, and increased hardness. Raloxifene markedly increased material level cortical hardness and elastic modulus. These results show the different mechanisms by which anti-catabolics and bone anabolics reduce fracture risk. PTH influences microarchitecture, whereas bisphosphonates alter material-level bone properties, with probable opposite effects on remodeling space. Raloxifene primarily improved the material stiffness at the cortical level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19063681     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  15 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative phenotyping of bone fracture repair: a review.

Authors:  Michele Casanova; Aaron Schindeler; David Little; Ralph Müller; Philipp Schneider
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-07-30

Review 2.  The effect of antiresorptives on bone quality.

Authors:  Robert R Recker; Laura Armas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  The Role of Water Compartments in the Material Properties of Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Contribution of mineral to bone structural behavior and tissue mechanical properties.

Authors:  Eve Donnelly; Dan X Chen; Adele L Boskey; Shefford P Baker; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Antifracture efficacy of currently available therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Decreased oxidative stress and greater bone anabolism in the aged, when compared to the young, murine skeleton with parathyroid hormone administration.

Authors:  Robert L Jilka; Maria Almeida; Elena Ambrogini; Li Han; Paula K Roberson; Robert S Weinstein; Starros C Manolagas
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 9.304

7.  PTH1-34 alleviates radiotherapy-induced local bone loss by improving osteoblast and osteocyte survival.

Authors:  Abhishek Chandra; Tiao Lin; Mary Beth Tribble; Ji Zhu; Allison R Altman; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yejia Zhang; Sunday O Akintoye; Keith Cengel; X Sherry Liu; Ling Qin
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Collagen cross-links as a determinant of bone quality: a possible explanation for bone fragility in aging, osteoporosis, and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M Saito; K Marumo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Biological regulation of bone quality.

Authors:  Tamara Alliston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Mecp2 deficiency decreases bone formation and reduces bone volume in a rodent model of Rett syndrome.

Authors:  R D O'Connor; M Zayzafoon; M C Farach-Carson; N C Schanen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.