Literature DB >> 19062073

Size, shape, and asymmetry in fossil hominins: the status of the LB1 cranium based on 3D morphometric analyses.

Karen L Baab1, Kieran P McNulty.   

Abstract

The unique set of morphological characteristics of the Liang Bua hominins (Homo floresiensis) has been attributed to explanations as diverse as insular dwarfism and pathological microcephaly. This study examined the relationship between cranial size and shape across a range of hominin and African ape species to test whether or not cranial morphology of LB1 is consistent with the basic pattern of static allometry present in these various taxa. Correlations between size and 3D cranial shape were explored using principal components analysis in shape space and in Procrustes form space. Additionally, patterns of static allometry within both modern humans and Plio-Pleistocene hominins were used to simulate the expected cranial shapes of each group at the size of LB1. These hypothetical specimens were compared to LB1 both visually and statistically. Results of most analyses indicated that LB1 best fits predictions for a small specimen of fossil Homo but not for a small modern human. This was especially true for analyses of neurocranial landmarks. Results from the whole cranium were less clear about the specific affinities of LB1, but, importantly, demonstrated that aspects of facial morphology associated with smaller size converge on modern human morphology. This suggests that facial similarities between LB1 and anatomically modern humans may not be indicative of a close relationship. Landmark data collected from this study were also used to test the degree of cranial asymmetry in LB1. These comparisons indicated that the cranium is fairly asymmetrical, but within the range of asymmetry exhibited by modern humans and all extant African ape species. Compared to other fossil specimens, the degree of asymmetry in LB1 is moderate and readily explained by the taphonomic processes to which all fossils are subject. Taken together, these findings suggest that H. floresiensis was most likely the diminutive descendant of a species of archaic Homo, although the details of this evolutionary history remain obscure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062073     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  11 in total

1.  Determining sex by bone volume from 3D images: discriminating analysis of the tali and radii in a contemporary Spanish reference collection.

Authors:  Elena Ruiz Mediavilla; Bernardo Perea Pérez; Elena Labajo González; José Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Andrés Santiago Sáez; Enrique Dorado Fernández
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Craniometric ratios of microcephaly and LB1, Homo floresiensis, using MRI and endocasts.

Authors:  Robert C Vannucci; Todd F Barron; Ralph L Holloway
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The cranial biomechanics and feeding performance of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Rebecca W Cook; Antonino Vazzana; Rita Sorrentino; Stefano Benazzi; Amanda L Smith; David S Strait; Justin A Ledogar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Rare events in earth history include the LB1 human skeleton from Flores, Indonesia, as a developmental singularity, not a unique taxon.

Authors:  Robert B Eckhardt; Maciej Henneberg; Alex S Weller; Kenneth J Hsü
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolved developmental homeostasis disturbed in LB1 from Flores, Indonesia, denotes Down syndrome and not diagnostic traits of the invalid species Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Maciej Henneberg; Robert B Eckhardt; Sakdapong Chavanaves; Kenneth J Hsü
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Brain size of Homo floresiensis and its evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Daisuke Kubo; Reiko T Kono; Yousuke Kaifu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Neurocranium versus Face: A Morphometric Approach with Classical Anthropometric Variables for Characterizing Patterns of Cranial Integration in Extant Hominoids and Extinct Hominins.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Pérez-Claros; Juan Manuel Jiménez-Arenas; Paul Palmqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  3D-Geomorphometrics tooth shape analysis in hypodontia.

Authors:  Ibrahim Al-Shahrani; Wendy Dirks; Nicholas Jepson; Khaled Khalaf
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  A Critical Evaluation of the Down Syndrome Diagnosis for LB1, Type Specimen of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Karen L Baab; Peter Brown; Dean Falk; Joan T Richtsmeier; Charles F Hildebolt; Kirk Smith; William Jungers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples.

Authors:  Karen L Baab; Kieran P McNulty; Katerina Harvati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.