PURPOSE: To synthesize N-(3-(3-aminopropylamino)propyl)-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxamide (7), a novel DNA-binding, coumarin-based, fluorescent hydroxylradical ((*)OH) indicator and to assess its quantum efficiency compared with that of coumarin-3-carboxylic acid (1) and N1,N12-bis[2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carbonyl]- 1,12-diamine-4,9-diazadodecane (9). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using computer-generated molecular modeling, 7 and 9 and their respective 7-hydroxylated derivatives 8 and 10 were docked onto DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)2, the ligand-DNA complexes were energy minimized, and binding free energies and inhibition constants were calculated. Compound 7 was judged an appropriate target molecule and was synthesized. Compounds 1, 7, and 9 were incubated with Na(125)I or irradiated with (137)Cs gamma-rays, and the influence of pH, dose, type of radiation, and the concentration of indicator on fluorescence yield were determined. RESULTS: Non-fluorescent 7 and 9 are converted to fluorescent, 7-hydroxylated derivatives 8 and 10 after interaction with (*)OH in aqueous solution. For 1, 7, and 9, hydroxylation yield increases linearly with both Na(125)I dose (0-700 x 10(6) decays) and (137)Cs dose (0-11.0 Gy). Fluorescence induction is significantly reduced at acidic pH and the fluorescent quantum yield of 8 is approximately 3 times that of 2 or 10 at pH 7.0. With Na(125)I incubation and gamma-ray irradiation, the fluorescence signal of 7 increases linearly with concentration and saturates at approximately 50 microM. CONCLUSION: Compound 7 quantifies lower concentrations of (*)OH than do 1 and 9. This detector is therefore likely to be a good reporter of (*)OH produced within a few nanometers of DNA.
PURPOSE: To synthesize N-(3-(3-aminopropylamino)propyl)-2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carboxamide (7), a novel DNA-binding, coumarin-based, fluorescent hydroxylradical ((*)OH) indicator and to assess its quantum efficiency compared with that of coumarin-3-carboxylic acid (1) and N1,N12-bis[2-oxo-2H-chromene-3-carbonyl]- 1,12-diamine-4,9-diazadodecane (9). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using computer-generated molecular modeling, 7 and 9 and their respective 7-hydroxylated derivatives 8 and 10 were docked onto DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG)2, the ligand-DNA complexes were energy minimized, and binding free energies and inhibition constants were calculated. Compound 7 was judged an appropriate target molecule and was synthesized. Compounds 1, 7, and 9 were incubated with Na(125)I or irradiated with (137)Cs gamma-rays, and the influence of pH, dose, type of radiation, and the concentration of indicator on fluorescence yield were determined. RESULTS: Non-fluorescent 7 and 9 are converted to fluorescent, 7-hydroxylated derivatives 8 and 10 after interaction with (*)OH in aqueous solution. For 1, 7, and 9, hydroxylation yield increases linearly with both Na(125)I dose (0-700 x 10(6) decays) and (137)Cs dose (0-11.0 Gy). Fluorescence induction is significantly reduced at acidic pH and the fluorescent quantum yield of 8 is approximately 3 times that of 2 or 10 at pH 7.0. With Na(125)I incubation and gamma-ray irradiation, the fluorescence signal of 7 increases linearly with concentration and saturates at approximately 50 microM. CONCLUSION: Compound 7 quantifies lower concentrations of (*)OH than do 1 and 9. This detector is therefore likely to be a good reporter of (*)OH produced within a few nanometers of DNA.
Authors: G M Makrigiorgos; M Folkard; C Huang; E Bump; J Baranowska-Kortylewicz; S K Sahu; B D Michael; A I Kassis Journal: Radiat Res Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: H C Ha; N S Sirisoma; P Kuppusamy; J L Zweier; P M Woster; R A Casero Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-09-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G M Makrigiorgos; J Baranowska-Kortylewicz; E Bump; S K Sahu; R M Berman; A I Kassis Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 2.694