C Willmott1, J Ponsford. 1. Psychology Department, School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. catherine.willmott@med.monash.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Most previous studies evaluating the use of methylphenidate following traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been conducted many years post-injury. This study evaluated the efficacy of methylphenidate in facilitating cognitive function in the inpatient rehabilitation phase. METHODS:40 participants with moderate-severe TBI (mean 68 days post-injury) were recruited into a randomised, crossover, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Methylphenidate was administered at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg twice daily and lactose in identical capsules served as placebo. Methylphenidate and placebo administration was randomised in a crossover design across six sessions over a 2 week period. Primary efficacy outcomes were neuropsychological tests of attention. RESULTS: No participants were withdrawn because of side effects or adverse events. Methylphenidate significantly increased speed of information processing on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (95% CI 0.30 to 2.95, Cohen's d = 0.39, p = 0.02), Ruff 2 and 7 Test-Automatic Condition (95% CI 1.38 to 6.12, Cohen's d = 0.51, p = 0.003), Simple Selective Attention Task (95% CI -58.35 to -17.43, Cohen's d = 0.59, p = 0.001) and Dissimilar Compatible (95% CI -70.13 to -15.38, Cohen's d = 0.51, p = 0.003) and Similar Compatible (95% CI -74.82 to -19.06, Cohen's d = 0.55, p = 0.002) conditions of the Four Choice Reaction Time Task. Those with more severe injuries and slower baseline information processing speed demonstrated a greater drug response. CONCLUSIONS:Methylphenidate enhances information processing speed in the inpatient rehabilitation phase following TBI. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12607000503426).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Most previous studies evaluating the use of methylphenidate following traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been conducted many years post-injury. This study evaluated the efficacy of methylphenidate in facilitating cognitive function in the inpatient rehabilitation phase. METHODS: 40 participants with moderate-severe TBI (mean 68 days post-injury) were recruited into a randomised, crossover, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Methylphenidate was administered at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg twice daily and lactose in identical capsules served as placebo. Methylphenidate and placebo administration was randomised in a crossover design across six sessions over a 2 week period. Primary efficacy outcomes were neuropsychological tests of attention. RESULTS: No participants were withdrawn because of side effects or adverse events. Methylphenidate significantly increased speed of information processing on the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (95% CI 0.30 to 2.95, Cohen's d = 0.39, p = 0.02), Ruff 2 and 7 Test-Automatic Condition (95% CI 1.38 to 6.12, Cohen's d = 0.51, p = 0.003), Simple Selective Attention Task (95% CI -58.35 to -17.43, Cohen's d = 0.59, p = 0.001) and Dissimilar Compatible (95% CI -70.13 to -15.38, Cohen's d = 0.51, p = 0.003) and Similar Compatible (95% CI -74.82 to -19.06, Cohen's d = 0.55, p = 0.002) conditions of the Four Choice Reaction Time Task. Those with more severe injuries and slower baseline information processing speed demonstrated a greater drug response. CONCLUSIONS:Methylphenidate enhances information processing speed in the inpatient rehabilitation phase following TBI. This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12607000503426).
Authors: Anthony E Kline; Jacob B Leary; Hannah L Radabaugh; Jeffrey P Cheng; Corina O Bondi Journal: Prog Neurobiol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 11.685
Authors: Elizabeth LeBlond; Julia Smith-Paine; Jacqlyn J Riemersma; Paul S Horn; Shari L Wade; Brad G Kurowski Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Brenna C McDonald; Laura A Flashman; David B Arciniegas; Robert J Ferguson; Li Xing; Jaroslaw Harezlak; Gwen C Sprehn; Flora M Hammond; Arthur C Maerlender; Carrie L Kruck; Karen L Gillock; Kim Frey; Rachel N Wall; Andrew J Saykin; Thomas W McAllister Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Gina C Bao; Isabel H Bleimeister; Lydia A Zimmerman; JoDy L Wellcome; Peter J Niesman; Hannah L Radabaugh; Corina O Bondi; Anthony E Kline Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Jacob B Leary; Corina O Bondi; Megan J LaPorte; Lauren J Carlson; Hannah L Radabaugh; Jeffrey P Cheng; Anthony E Kline Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Patrick M Kochanek; Peter Bergold; Kimbra Kenney; Christine E Marx; Col Jamie B Grimes; L T C Yince Loh; L T C Gina E Adam; Devon Oskvig; Kenneth C Curley; Wanda Salzer Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Thomas W McAllister; Ross Zafonte; Sonia Jain; Laura A Flashman; Mark S George; Gerald A Grant; Feng He; James B Lohr; Norberto Andaluz; Lanier Summerall; Martin P Paulus; Rema Raman; Murray B Stein Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 7.853