Literature DB >> 19059894

Plantar loading comparisons between women with a history of second metatarsal stress fractures and normal controls.

Robin M Queen1, Alicia N Abbey, Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong, James A Nunley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stress fractures are common in athletics and are more prevalent in women. The current literature has not identified a reason for this gender difference. HYPOTHESIS: Women with a history of a second/third metatarsal stress fracture will demonstrate differences in loading in the middle forefoot. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Fifteen men, 15 control women, and 9 women with a history of a second/third metatarsal stress fracture were asked to run at 3.3 m/s +/- 5% along a 10-m runway. Plantar loading parameters were recorded using a Pedar-X system.
RESULTS: The women with fractures demonstrated a decrease in contact area and maximum force beneath the middle forefoot when compared with the female controls. Men demonstrated a decreased contact area in the medial and middle forefoot when compared with the control women. In addition, the women with fractures had decreased maximum force in the middle forefoot when compared with the control women.
CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in maximum force in the middle forefoot in patients with a previous stress fracture could have resulted from gait alterations after the fracture. Therefore, prospective studies need to be completed to better understand the loading differences that could be used to predict stress-fracture injury risk. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is unclear whether plantar loading can be used as a predictor of stress-fracture injury risk as these patients were tested after a stress fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19059894     DOI: 10.1177/0363546508324967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  Proximal base stress fracture of the second metatarsal in a Highland dancer.

Authors:  Hannah Isabella Watson; Barry O'Donnell; Graeme Philip Hopper; Winston Chang
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-06-26

2.  Impact reduction during running: efficiency of simple acute interventions in recreational runners.

Authors:  Marlène Giandolini; Pierrick J Arnal; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicolas Peyrot; Pierre Samozino; Blaise Dubois; Jean-Benoît Morin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.

Authors:  Jennifer Baltich; Christian Maurer; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Stress fractures of the foot and ankle in athletes.

Authors:  Stephanie W Mayer; Patrick W Joyner; Louis C Almekinders; Selene G Parekh
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Force and acceleration characteristics of military foot drill: implications for injury risk in recruits.

Authors:  Patrick P J Carden; Rachel M Izard; Julie P Greeves; Jason P Lake; Stephen D Myers
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2015-08-21

6.  Walking Gait Before and After Chiropractic Care Following Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: A Single Case Kinetic and Kinematic Study.

Authors:  Brent S Russell; Kathryn T Hoiriis; Ronald S Hosek
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-06-14

Review 7.  Is changing footstrike pattern beneficial to runners?

Authors:  Joseph Hamill; Allison H Gruber
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 7.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.