Purification and properties of a neurotensin-degrading endopeptidase from pig brain.

Neurotensin (NT) endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.16) has been purified about 800-fold from pig brain by four sequential chromatographic steps depending on ion-exchange and hydrophobic interactions. Two types of preparation were studied: one from a Triton X-100-solubilized membrane fraction, and the other from the soluble fraction containing 90% or more of the total activity in the homogenate. NT endopeptidase activity was monitored by high-precision liquid chromatography of the two peptide products, characterized as NT-(1-10) and NT-(1-8), resulting from cleavage of the Pro10-Tyr11 and Arg8-Arg9 bonds respectively. As purification proceeded, from both membranes and cytosol, the yield of the two products achieved a constant ratio of 5:1 and this ratio was reproduced in repeated purifications. However, a distinct peptidase which hydrolysed exclusively at the Arg8-Arg9 bond was partially resolved from NT endopeptidase by chromatography on hydroxyapatite, and this activity was further purified and assigned to endopeptidase-24.15 (EC 3.4.24.15). SDS/PAGE of both preparations of neurotensin endopeptidase revealed a major band of apparent Mr 75000, and treatment of the membrane-associated form with N-Glycanase gave no evidence that the enzyme was a glycoprotein. The membrane-associated and cytosol forms of NT endopeptidase activities, monitored for both NT-(1-10) and NT-(1-8) products, were compared in their responses to 1,10-phenanthroline, EDTA, dithiothreitol (DTT) and some synthetic site-directed inhibitors of endopeptidase-24.15 or peptidyl dipeptidase A. The effects revealed no significant differences between the two preparations, nor did the reagents discriminate between the activities generating the two NT fragments. The partially purified form of endopeptidase-24.15 was also included in this comparison: while some responses were similar, this peptidase was distinguishable in its activation by DTT and its relative resistance to inhibition by EDTA. Both forms of NT endopeptidase were found to hydrolyse other substrates, including Boc-Phe-Ala-Ala-Phe-4-aminobenzoate, bradykinin and substance P (these at faster rates than neurotensin), as well as dynorphin A-(1-8) and luliberin. The bonds hydrolysed in these neuropeptides, as well as in angiotensins I and II and alpha-neoendorphin, were defined. These studies confirm that NT endopeptidase is distinct from endopeptidase-24.15. They further show that the former is a soluble enzyme, not an integral membrane protein, that it is not peptide-specific and that it might be more appropriately named. enzyme, not an integral membrane protein, that it is not peptide-specific and