Literature DB >> 19058919

Dosimetric changes resulting from patient rotational setup errors in proton therapy prostate plans.

Samir V Sejpal1, Richard A Amos, Jaques B Bluett, Lawrence B Levy, Rajat J Kudchadker, Jennifer Johnson, Seungtaek Choi, Andrew K Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dose changes to the target and critical structures from rotational setup errors in prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 70 plans were analyzed for 10 patients treated with parallel-opposed proton beams to a dose of 7,600 (60)Co-cGy-equivalent (CcGE) in 200 CcGE fractions to the clinical target volume (i.e., prostate and proximal seminal vesicles). Rotational setup errors of +3 degrees , -3 degrees , +5 degrees , and -5 degrees (to simulate pelvic tilt) were generated by adjusting the gantry. Horizontal couch shifts of +3 degrees and -3 degrees (to simulate longitudinal setup variability) were also generated. Verification plans were recomputed, keeping the same treatment parameters as the control.
RESULTS: All changes shown are for 38 fractions. The mean clinical target volume dose was 7,780 CcGE. The mean change in the clinical target volume dose in the worse case scenario for all shifts was 2 CcGE (absolute range in worst case scenario, 7,729-7,848 CcGE). The mean changes in the critical organ dose in the worst case scenario was 6 CcGE (bladder), 18 CcGE (rectum), 36 CcGE (anterior rectal wall), and 141 CcGE (femoral heads) for all plans. In general, the percentage of change in the worse case scenario for all shifts to the critical structures was <5%. Deviations in the absolute percentage of volume of organ receiving 45 and 70 Gy for the bladder and rectum were <2% for all plans.
CONCLUSION: Patient rotational movements of 3 degrees and 5 degrees and horizontal couch shifts of 3 degrees in prostate proton planning did not confer clinically significant dose changes to the target volumes or critical structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19058919     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Dosimetric consequences of rotational errors in radiation therapy of pediatric brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; Alexander Pegram; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Dosimetric effects of quality assurance-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer.

Authors:  Yuta Omi; Keisuke Yasui; Akira Shimomura; Rie Muramatsu; Hiromitsu Iwata; Hiroyuki Ogino; Akari Furukawa; Naoki Hayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-07-27

3.  Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jason A Efstathiou; Gregory C Sharp; Hsiao-Ming Lu; I Frank Ciernik; Alexei V Trofimov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The influence of patient positioning uncertainties in proton radiotherapy on proton range and dose distributions.

Authors:  Jakob Liebl; Harald Paganetti; Mingyao Zhu; Brian A Winey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Interfractional variations in the setup of pelvic bony anatomy and soft tissue, and their implications on the delivery of proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alexei Trofimov; Paul L Nguyen; Jason A Efstathiou; Yi Wang; Hsiao-Ming Lu; Martijn Engelsman; Scott Merrick; Chee-Wai Cheng; James R Wong; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Dosimetric consequences of rotational setup errors with direct simulation in a treatment planning system for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jean L Peng; Chihray Liu; Yu Chen; Robert J Amdur; Kenneth Vanek; Jonathan G Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 8.  Adaptive optimization by 6 DOF robotic couch in prostate volumetric IMRT treatment: rototranslational shift and dosimetric consequences.

Authors:  Silvia Chiesa; Lorenzo Placidi; Luigi Azario; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Francesca Greco; Andrea Damiani; Giovanna Mantini; Vincenzo Frascino; Angelo Piermattei; Vincenzo Valentini; Mario Balducci
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A method for acquiring random range uncertainty probability distributions in proton therapy.

Authors:  S M Holloway; M D Holloway; S J Thomas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Sophie Mangan; Michelle Leech
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-10-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.