Literature DB >> 19058327

A feasibility trial of computer-aided diagnosis for enteric lesions in capsule endoscopy.

Tao Gan1, Jun-Chao Wu, Ni-Ni Rao, Tao Chen, Bing Liu.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate and evaluate the feasibility of the computer-aided screening diagnosis for enteric lesions in the capsule endoscopy (CE).
METHODS: After developing a series of algorithms for the screening diagnosis of the enteric lesions in CE based on their characteristic colors and contours, the normal and abnormal images obtained from 289 patients were respectively scanned and diagnosed by the CE readers and by the computer-aided screening for the enteric lesions with the image-processed software (IPS). The enteric lesions shown by the images included esoenteritis, mucosal ulcer and erosion, bleeding, space-occupying lesions, angioectasia, diverticula, parasites, etc. The images for the lesions or the suspected lesions confirmed by the CE readers and the computers were collected, and the effectiveness rate of the screening and the number of the scanned images were evaluated, respectively.
RESULTS: Compared with the diagnostic results obtained by the CE readers, the total effectiveness rate (sensitivity) in the screening of the commonly-encountered enteric lesions by IPS varied from 42.9% to 91.2%, with a median of 74.2%, though the specificity and the accuracy rates were still low, and the images for the rarely-encountered lesions were difficult to differentiate from the normal images. However, the number of the images screened by IPS was 5000 on average, and only 10%-15% of the original images were left behind. As a result, a large number of normal images were excluded, and the reading time decreased from 5 h to 1 h on average.
CONCLUSION: Though the total accuracy and specificity rates by the computer-aided screening for the enteric lesions with IPS are much lower than those by the CE readers, the computer-aided screening diagnosis can exclude a large number of the normal images and confine the enteric lesions to 5000 images on average, which can reduce the workload of the readers in the scanning of the images. This computer-aided screening technique can make a correct diagnosis as efficiently as possible in most of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19058327      PMCID: PMC2773855          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.6929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  32 in total

1.  Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  G Iddan; G Meron; A Glukhovsky; P Swain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A).

Authors:  G D Meron
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  P Swain
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  The accuracy of an endoscopy nurse in interpreting capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Gavin N Levinthal; Carol A Burke; Janice M Santisi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Cost and implementation analysis of a personal digital assistant system for laboratory data collection.

Authors:  J A Blaya; W Gomez; P Rodriguez; H Fraser
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  "The cure is in hand"? The brave new world of handheld computers in medicine.

Authors:  Kenneth De Ville
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  A model of contour extraction including multiple scales, flexible inhibition and attention.

Authors:  Giuseppe-Emiliano La Cara; Mauro Ursino
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2008-03-08

Review 8.  New frontiers in small-bowel imaging: the expanding technology of capsule endoscopy and its impact in clinical gastroenterology.

Authors:  Suryakanth R Gurudu; Hugo E Vargas; Jonathan A Leighton
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2008

9.  Meta-analysis: capsule enteroscopy vs. conventional modalities in diagnosis of small bowel diseases.

Authors:  R Marmo; G Rotondano; R Piscopo; M A Bianco; L Cipolletta
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 8.171

10.  Complications, limitations, and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases.

Authors:  Emanuele Rondonotti; Juan Manuel Herrerias; Marco Pennazio; Angel Caunedo; Miguel Mascarenhas-Saraiva; Roberto de Franchis
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  New vision in video capsule endoscopy: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Laurel R Fisher; William L Hasler
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal diagnosis using non-white light imaging capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Gerard Cummins; Benjamin F Cox; Gastone Ciuti; Thineskrishna Anbarasan; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Sandy Cochran; Robert Steele; John N Plevris; Anastasios Koulaouzidis
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 46.802

3.  Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Saurin; Philippe Jacob; Laurent Heyries; Christian Pesanti; Franck Cholet; Isaac Fassler; James Boulant; Slim Bramli; Antoin De Leusse; Gabriel Rahmi
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.