Literature DB >> 19056616

Nephrology training programs and applicants: a very good match.

Donald E Kohan1, Mark E Rosenberg.   

Abstract

A critical mission of academic nephrology programs is training the next generation of nephrologists. Attracting high-quality candidates into nephrology training programs is the first step in this process. The training program directors (TPDs) in nephrology launched an initiative several years ago to standardize the application and recruitment process for applicants to their programs. This has recently culminated in the completion of a formal matching process using the Medical Specialties Matching Program (MSMP). This review will outline the history of this process and present the results of the recent matching process in nephrology for applicants who applied to training programs with a start date of July 1, 2009. The authors report that 89% of participating programs and 95% of applicant positions were filled. On the basis of a survey of nephrology TPDs, the match process was successful, with almost all respondents planning on participating in the match with a start date of July 1, 2010. Certain issues remain, including determining the correct number of interviews, how many applicants to rank, and whether four tracks are necessary. It is concluded that the nephrology match is of benefit to both training programs and applicants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19056616     DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04280808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Native Kidney Biopsy: Update and Evidence for Best Practice.

Authors:  Jonathan J Hogan; Michaela Mocanu; Jeffrey S Berns
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 2.  Perspectives on the Nephrology Match for Fellowship Applicants.

Authors:  Michael J Ross; Gregory Braden
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Factors in career choice among US nephrologists.

Authors:  Gearoid M McMahon; Lynette Thomas; J Kevin Tucker; Julie Lin
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Factors influencing pediatric nephrology trainee entry into the workforce.

Authors:  Adam R Weinstein; Kimberly Reidy; Victoria F Norwood; John D Mahan
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  How to Successfully Train a Modern Nephrologist: Experience from US Fellowship Training Practice.

Authors:  Hui Cai; Zhong Jiang; Xiongying Chen; James L Bailey
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-17

6.  "What do you think about nephrology?" A national survey of internal medicine residents.

Authors:  Georges N Nakhoul; Ali Mehdi; Jonathan J Taliercio; Susana Arrigain; Jesse D Schold; Abby Spencer; Jessica Greenfield; Amit Diwakar; Grace Snyder; John O'Toole; Joseph V Nally; John R Sedor; Patricia F Kao; S Beth Bierer
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Alternative ideas to increase the percentage of filled seats in nephrology fellowships.

Authors:  Tejas Desai
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.