Literature DB >> 19055992

Clinical outcomes according to baseline blood pressure in patients with a low ejection fraction in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity) Program.

Peter A Meredith1, Jan Ostergren, Inder Anand, Margareta Puu, Scott D Solomon, Eric L Michelson, Bertil Olofsson, Christopher B Granger, Salim Yusuf, Karl Swedberg, Marc A Pfeffer, John J V McMurray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan, according to baseline blood pressure (BP), in the 4,576 patients with a low ejection fraction (EF) (<or=0.40) in the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) program.
BACKGROUND: Hypotension is a predictor of poor prognosis in heart failure, yet many treatments shown to reduce morbidity and mortality lower blood pressure. This paradox creates a dilemma for physicians and may explain why low BP is reported as a reason for under-use of these agents.
METHODS: The interaction between treatment and baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was examined with patients divided into 6 SBP categories (<or=100, 101 to 110, 111 to 120, 121 to 130, 131 to 140 and >or=141 mm Hg) and 4 DBP categories (<or=60, 61 to 70, 71 to 80 and >or=81 mm Hg).
RESULTS: Low SBP and DBP were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Baseline BP did not modify the effects of candesartan on clinical outcomes: the interaction p value between SBP category and treatment was 0.38 (0.22 for DBP category). For both placebo and candesartan, study drug discontinuation for adverse effects (especially hypotension) was highest in patients in the lowest baseline BP categories. However, the relative risk of discontinuation for hypotension, renal dysfunction, and hyperkalemia in the candesartan compared with placebo group was not increased in patients with a low baseline BP.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low EF heart failure, the relative risks and benefits of candesartan treatment were similar in patients with a low BP compared to those with a higher BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19055992     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  14 in total

Review 1.  Paradoxical and bidirectional drug effects.

Authors:  Silas W Smith; Manfred Hauben; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Risk of Stroke and Cardiac Events in Heart Failure: Data From the Warfarin Versus Aspirin in Reduced Ejection Fraction Trial.

Authors:  Marco R Di Tullio; Min Qian; John L P Thompson; Arthur J Labovitz; Douglas L Mann; Ralph L Sacco; Patrick M Pullicino; Ronald S Freudenberger; John R Teerlink; Susan Graham; Gregory Y H Lip; Bruce Levin; J P Mohr; Richard Buchsbaum; Conrado J Estol; Dirk J Lok; Piotr Ponikowski; Stefan D Anker; Shunichi Homma
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  What will be the role of I-123 MIBG in improving the outcome of medically treated heart failure patients?

Authors:  Fahad Waqar; Stephanie H Dunlap; Myron C Gerson
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Nicole Martin; Karthick Manoharan; Ceri Davies; R Thomas Lumbers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-22

Review 5.  Beta-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system for chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Nicole Martin; Karthick Manoharan; James Thomas; Ceri Davies; R Thomas Lumbers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-28

6.  Development of hypotension in patients newly diagnosed with heart failure in UK general practice: retrospective cohort and nested case-control analyses.

Authors:  Mar Martín-Pérez; Alexander Michel; Mark Ma; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Blood Pressure, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Matteo Serenelli; Alice Jackson; Pooja Dewan; Pardeep S Jhund; Mark C Petrie; Patrick Rossignol; Gianluca Campo; Bertram Pitt; Faiez Zannad; João Pedro Ferreira; John J V McMurray
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 12.035

8.  Systolic Blood Pressure in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan.

Authors:  Senthil Selvaraj; Brian L Claggett; Michael Böhm; Stefan D Anker; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Faiez Zannad; Burkert Pieske; Carolyn S P Lam; Inder S Anand; Victor C Shi; Martin P Lefkowitz; John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Is the blood pressure paradox observed in all heart failure patients?

Authors:  F M Cunha; P Lourenço; M Couto; P Tavares; S Silva; J T Guimarães; P Bettencourt
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The Prognostic Factors of Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy: A single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Wei Fang; Rong Luo; Yibin Tang; Wei Hua; Michael Fu; Weizhong Chen; Li Lai; Xiaoping Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.