Literature DB >> 22272687

Paradoxical and bidirectional drug effects.

Silas W Smith1, Manfred Hauben, Jeffrey K Aronson.   

Abstract

A paradoxical drug reaction constitutes an outcome that is opposite from the outcome that would be expected from the drug's known actions. There are three types: 1. A paradoxical response in a condition for which the drug is being explicitly prescribed. 2. Paradoxical precipitation of a condition for which the drug is indicated, when the drug is being used for an alternative indication. 3. Effects that are paradoxical in relation to an aspect of the pharmacology of the drug but unrelated to the usual indication. In bidirectional drug reactions, a drug may produce opposite effects, either in the same or different individuals, the effects usually being different from the expected beneficial effect. Paradoxical and bidirectional drug effects can sometimes be harnessed for benefit; some may be adverse. Such reactions arise in a wide variety of drug classes. Some are common; others are reported in single case reports. Paradoxical effects are often adverse, since they are opposite the direction of the expected effect. They may complicate the assessment of adverse drug reactions, pharmacovigilance, and clinical management. Bidirectional effects may be clinically useful or adverse. From a clinical toxicological perspective, altered pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics in overdose may exacerbate paradoxical and bidirectional effects. Certain antidotes have paradoxical attributes, complicating management. Apparent clinical paradoxical or bidirectional effects and reactions ensue when conflicts arise at different levels in self-regulating biological systems, as complexity increases from subcellular components, such as receptors, to cells, tissues, organs, and the whole individual. These may be incompletely understood. Mechanisms of such effects include different actions at the same receptor, owing to changes with time and downstream effects; stereochemical effects; multiple receptor targets with or without associated temporal effects; antibody-mediated reactions; three-dimensional architectural constraints; pharmacokinetic competing compartment effects; disruption and non-linear effects in oscillating systems, systemic overcompensation, and other higher-level feedback mechanisms and feedback response loops at multiple levels. Here we review and provide a compendium of multiple class effects and individual reactions, relevant mechanisms, and specific clinical toxicological considerations of antibiotics, immune modulators, antineoplastic drugs, and cardiovascular, CNS, dermal, endocrine, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, haematological, respiratory, and psychotropic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22272687     DOI: 10.2165/11597710-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  152 in total

1.  Cushing's syndrome with a paradoxical response to dexamethasone.

Authors:  F S French; J A Macfie; B Baggett; T F Williams; J J Van Wyk
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Electrophysiology of benzodiazepine receptor ligands: multiple mechanisms and sites of action.

Authors:  P Polc
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 3.  Side effects of using nitrates to treat angina.

Authors:  Udho Thadani; Tiffany Rodgers
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.250

Review 4.  Under-recognised paradox of neuropathy from rapid glycaemic control.

Authors:  M K S Leow; J Wyckoff
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Rule-based cell systems model of aging using feedback loop motifs mediated by stress responses.

Authors:  Andres Kriete; William J Bosl; Glenn Booker
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Potential hazard of methylene blue.

Authors:  J G Whitwam; A R Taylor; J M White
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  A case of fatal caffeine poisoning.

Authors:  T Rudolph; K Knudsen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  The risk of paradoxical levetiracetam effect is increased in mentally retarded patients.

Authors:  Anna Szucs; Zsófia Clemens; Rita Jakus; György Rásonyi; Daniel Fabó; András Holló; Gábor Barcs; Anna Kelemen; József Janszky
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  The epidemiology of tick-borne relapsing fever in Iran during 1997-2006.

Authors:  H Masoumi Asl; M M Goya; H Vatandoost; S M Zahraei; M Mafi; M Asmar; N Piazak; Z Aghighi
Journal:  Travel Med Infect Dis       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 6.211

10.  Acute tolerance to rate-decreasing effects of single doses of ethanol.

Authors:  Brett C Ginsburg; Gerardo Martinez; Gregory Friesenhahn; Martin Javors; R J Lamb
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-02-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Causal assessment of pharmaceutical treatments: why standards of evidence should not be the same for benefits and harms?

Authors:  Barbara Osimani; Fiorenzo Mignini
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  The law of mass action and the pharmacological concentration-effect curve: resolving the paradox of apparently non-dose-related adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Distinguishing hazards and harms, adverse drug effects and adverse drug reactions : implications for drug development, clinical trials, pharmacovigilance, biomarkers, and monitoring.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Hormesis and paradoxical effects of pea (Pisum sativum L.) parameters upon exposure to formaldehyde in a wide range of doses.

Authors:  Elena A Erofeeva
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Dependence of Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale Wigg.) Seed Reproduction Indices on Intensity of Motor Traffic Pollution.

Authors:  Elena A Erofeeva
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Hormesis and paradoxical effects of wheat seedling (triticum aestivum L.) parameters upon exposure to different pollutants in a wide range of doses.

Authors:  Elena A Erofeeva
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Dependence of Guaiacol Peroxidase Activity and Lipid Peroxidation Rate in Drooping Birch (Betula pendula Roth) and Tillet (Tilia cordata Mill) Leaf on Motor Traffic Pollution Intensity.

Authors:  Elena A Erofeeva
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Unresolved questions in rheumatology: motion for debate: the data support evidence-based management recommendations for cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Mike J L Peters; Michael T Nurmohamed; Will Dixon
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2013-07

9.  Reducing the noise in signal detection of adverse drug reactions by standardizing the background: a pilot study on analyses of proportional reporting ratios-by-therapeutic area.

Authors:  Birgitta Grundmark; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Björn Zethelius
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Hormesis and Paradoxical Effects of Drooping Birch (Betula pendula Roth) Parameters Under Motor Traffic Pollution.

Authors:  Elena A Erofeeva
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.