BACKGROUND: Comprehensive multisystem clinical assessment using the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity score (BVAS) is widely used in therapeutic studies of systemic vasculitis. Extensive use suggested a need to revise the instrument. The previous version of BVAS has been revised, according to usage and reviewed by an expert committee. OBJECTIVE: To modify and validate version 3 of the BVAS in patients with systemic vasculitis. METHODS: The new version of BVAS was tested in a prospective cross-sectional study of patients with vasculitis. RESULTS: The number of items was reduced from 66 to 56. The subscores for new/worse disease and persistent disease were unified. In 313 patients with systemic vasculitis, BVAS(v.3) correlated with treatment decision (Spearman's r(s) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.72), BVAS1 of version 2 (r(s) = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96), BVAS2 of version 2 in patients with persistent disease (r(s) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83), C-reactive protein levels (r(s) = 0.43, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54), physician's global assessment (r(s) = 0.91, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.93) and vasculitis activity index (r(s) = 0.88, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.91). The intraclass correlation coefficients for reproducibility and repeatability were 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97), respectively. In 39 patients assessed at diagnosis and again at 3 months, the BVAS(v.3) fell by 17 (95% CI 15 to 19) units (p<0.001, paired t test). CONCLUSION: BVAS(v.3) demonstrates convergence with BVAS(v.2), treatment decision, physician global assessment of disease activity, vasculitis activity index and C-reactive protein. It is repeatable, reproducible and sensitive to change. The new version of BVAS is validated for assessment of systemic vasculitis.
BACKGROUND: Comprehensive multisystem clinical assessment using the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity score (BVAS) is widely used in therapeutic studies of systemic vasculitis. Extensive use suggested a need to revise the instrument. The previous version of BVAS has been revised, according to usage and reviewed by an expert committee. OBJECTIVE: To modify and validate version 3 of the BVAS in patients with systemic vasculitis. METHODS: The new version of BVAS was tested in a prospective cross-sectional study of patients with vasculitis. RESULTS: The number of items was reduced from 66 to 56. The subscores for new/worse disease and persistent disease were unified. In 313 patients with systemic vasculitis, BVAS(v.3) correlated with treatment decision (Spearman's r(s) = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.72), BVAS1 of version 2 (r(s) = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.96), BVAS2 of version 2 in patients with persistent disease (r(s) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.83), C-reactive protein levels (r(s) = 0.43, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.54), physician's global assessment (r(s) = 0.91, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.93) and vasculitis activity index (r(s) = 0.88, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.91). The intraclass correlation coefficients for reproducibility and repeatability were 0.96 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97), respectively. In 39 patients assessed at diagnosis and again at 3 months, the BVAS(v.3) fell by 17 (95% CI 15 to 19) units (p<0.001, paired t test). CONCLUSION: BVAS(v.3) demonstrates convergence with BVAS(v.2), treatment decision, physician global assessment of disease activity, vasculitis activity index and C-reactive protein. It is repeatable, reproducible and sensitive to change. The new version of BVAS is validated for assessment of systemic vasculitis.
Authors: Michael E Wechsler; Praveen Akuthota; David Jayne; Paneez Khoury; Amy Klion; Carol A Langford; Peter A Merkel; Frank Moosig; Ulrich Specks; Maria C Cid; Raashid Luqmani; Judith Brown; Stephen Mallett; Richard Philipson; Steve W Yancey; Jonathan Steinfeld; Peter F Weller; Gerald J Gleich Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Sang-Won Lee; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Yong-Beom Park; Kwang-Hyub Han; Jun Yong Park Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-05-12 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: A Scott McCall; Gautam Bhave; Vadim Pedchenko; Jacob Hess; Meghan Free; Dustin J Little; Thomas P Baker; William F Pendergraft; Ronald J Falk; Stephen W Olson; Billy G Hudson Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 10.121