Literature DB >> 19054289

Quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales.

S J Jenkins1, C D Lynch, A J Sloan, A S M Gilmour.   

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to describe the quality of prescription and fabrication of single-unit crowns by general dental practitioners in Wales. One hundred pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to commercial laboratories in Wales with large catchment areas, and 20 pre-piloted questionnaires were distributed to the production laboratory at the Cardiff Dental Hospital. Information was collected relating to the quality of prescription and master impressions for single-unit crowns. One hundred and seven completed questionnaires were returned (response rate = 89%). Sixty per cent (n = 64) of questionnaires related to single-unit crowns being made in general practice under private funding arrangements, 30% (n = 32) were being made in general dental practice under National Health Service (public) funding arrangements and 10% (n = 11) were collected from the Dental Hospital. Polyvinylsiloxane impression material was used to record the master impression in all cases (n = 107). Plastic stock trays were used to make the master impression in 79% of cases (n = 85), metal stock trays were used in 19% of cases (n = 20) and special trays were used in 2% of cases (n = 2). Eighty-five per cent (n = 91) of master casts were considered to be adequate for crown fabrication. Less than 50% of written instructions (n = 52) were considered 'clear' and of sufficient detail to adequately specify the planned crown. In 21% of cases (n = 22), the technician had to contact the dentist for clarification of the design prior to making the crown. While the quality of impression making for single-unit crowns was of a reasonable standard, the quality of the accompanying written communication was poor and more than one-half of written instructions examined failed to meet the requirements of the European Union Medical Devices Directive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19054289     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01916.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  5 in total

1.  Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 1: communication methods.

Authors:  J Berry; M Nesbit; S Saberi; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Communication methods and production techniques in fixed prosthesis fabrication: a UK based survey. Part 2: production techniques.

Authors:  J Berry; M Nesbit; S Saberi; H Petridis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Quality of communication between dentists and dental laboratory technicians for fixed prosthodontics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Huda Tulbah; Eman AlHamdan; Amal AlQahtani; Asma AlShahrani; Mona AlShaye
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-06-09

4.  A study to assess communication hindrances by the means of work authorization for fixed dental prosthesis: A survey.

Authors:  Sneha Harish Shetty; Karuna Gajanan Pawashe; Pronob Sanyal; R Sushma
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-04-07

5.  Evaluation of the quality of fixed prosthesis impressions in private laboratories in a sample from Yemen.

Authors:  Nusaiba M Al-Odinee; Mohsen Al-Hamzi; Ibrahim Z Al-Shami; Ahmed Madfa; Abdulwahab I Al-Kholani; Yazeed M Al-Olofi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.