Literature DB >> 19052716

Differences in tendon graft healing between the intra-articular and extra-articular ends of a bone tunnel.

Asheesh Bedi1, Sumito Kawamura, Liang Ying, Scott A Rodeo.   

Abstract

The basic biology of healing between a tendon graft and bone tunnel remains incompletely understood. Distinct variability in the morphological characteristics of the healing tendon-bone attachment site has been reported. We hypothesized that spatial and temporal differences in tendon-to-bone healing exist at different regions of a surgically created bone tunnel. Twenty-four male, Sprague-Dawley rats underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the left knee using a flexor digitorum longus tendon graft secured using suspensory periosteal fixation. Animals were sacrificed at 4, 7, 11, 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery and prepared for routine histology and immunohistochemical analysis of the healing enthesis at the intra-articular aperture (IAA), mid-tunnel, and extra-articular aperture (EAA). Six animals were used to measure mineral apposition rate (MAR) along the healing bone tunnel by double fluorochrome labeling at 14 and 28 days after surgery. The total area of calcified bone matrix was assessed with von Kossa staining and Goldner-Masson trichrome staining, respectively. The healing tendon-bone interface tissue exhibited a wide chondroid matrix at the IAA, in contrast to a narrow, fibrous matrix at the EAA. There were significantly more osteoclasts at the IAA compared to EAA throughout the study period, except 4 days after surgery (p < 0.05). Collagen continuity between the tendon graft and bone tunnel increased over time, with a more parallel orientation and increased collagen fiber continuity between tendon and bone at the EAA compared to the IAA. MAR was also significantly greater at the EAA at 4 weeks (p < 0.001). Significant differences in healing between the tendon graft and bone exist along the length of bone tunnel secured with suspensory fixation. The etiology of these differences is likely multifactorial in nature, including variable biological and biomechanical environments at different ends of the tunnel. Understanding these differences may ultimately allow surgeons to improve the quality of graft fixation and long-term outcomes after ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19052716      PMCID: PMC2642544          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-008-9096-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  37 in total

1.  Biological fixation of the graft within bone after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rabbits: effects of the duration of postoperative immobilization.

Authors:  H Sakai; N Fukui; A Kawakami; H Kurosawa
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Insertion of autologous tendon grafts to the bone: a histological and immunohistochemical study of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts.

Authors:  W Petersen; H Laprell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; M Nagano; M Kurosaka; H Muratsu; K Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II: Histologic analysis after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Reinhard F G Hoffmann; Hermann J Bail; Oliver Rehm; Norbert P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The effect of outlet fixation on tunnel widening.

Authors:  F Alan Barber; Bryan Spruill; Maryann Sheluga
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  A geometric theory of the equilibrium mechanics of fibers in ligaments and tendons.

Authors:  J A Sidles; J M Clark; J L Garbini
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rabbits.

Authors:  A S Panni; G Milano; L Lucania; C Fabbriciani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Expression of the high molecular weight melanoma-associated antigen by pericytes during angiogenesis in tumors and in healing wounds.

Authors:  R O Schlingemann; F J Rietveld; R M de Waal; S Ferrone; D J Ruiter
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Aminopeptidase a is a constituent of activated pericytes in angiogenesis.

Authors:  R O Schlingemann; E Oosterwijk; P Wesseling; F J Rietveld; D J Ruiter
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Tendon-healing in a bone tunnel. A biomechanical and histological study in the dog.

Authors:  S A Rodeo; S P Arnoczky; P A Torzilli; C Hidaka; R F Warren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  26 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of tenodesis reconstruction in ankle with deltoid ligament deficiency: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Can Xu; Ming-Yan Zhang; Guang-Hua Lei; Can Zhang; Shu-Guang Gao; Wen Ting; Kang-Hua Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Effect of early and delayed mechanical loading on tendon-to-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; David Kovacevic; Alice J S Fox; Carl W Imhauser; Mark Stasiak; Jonathan Packer; Robert H Brophy; Xiang-Hua Deng; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Clinical results of a surgical technique using endobuttons for complete tendon tear of pectoralis major muscle: report of five cases.

Authors:  Yoshiyasu Uchiyama; Seiji Miyazaki; Tetsuro Tamaki; Eiji Shimpuku; Akiyoshi Handa; Hiroko Omi; Joji Mochida
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2011-09-28

4.  Amplifying Bone Marrow Progenitors Expressing α-Smooth Muscle Actin Produce Zonal Insertion Sites During Tendon-to-Bone Repair.

Authors:  Timur B Kamalitdinov; Keitaro Fujino; Snehal S Shetye; Xi Jiang; Yaping Ye; Ashley B Rodriguez; Andrew F Kuntz; Miltiadis H Zgonis; Nathaniel A Dyment
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 5.  All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Authors:  Alexander J Connaughton; Andrew G Geeslin; Christopher W Uggen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-19

6.  The Rotator Cuff Organ: Integrating Developmental Biology, Tissue Engineering, and Surgical Considerations to Treat Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Thierry Pauyo; Richard E Debski; Mark W Rodosky; Rocky S Tuan; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.389

7.  Morphological changes in femoral tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yuta Tachibana; Tatsuo Mae; Konsei Shino; Takashi Kanamoto; Kazuomi Sugamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa; Ken Nakata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Effect of tibial drill-guide angle on the mechanical environment at bone tunnel aperture after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jie Yao; Chun Yi Wen; Ming Zhang; Jason Tak-Man Cheung; Chunhoi Yan; Kwong-Yuen Chiu; William Weijia Lu; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Human fascia lata ECM scaffold augmented with immobilized hyaluronan: inflammatory response and remodeling in the canine body wall and shoulder implantation sites.

Authors:  Diane R Leigh; Myung-Sun Kim; David Kovacevic; Andrew R Baker; Carmela D Tan; Anthony Calabro; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 10.  Cellular therapy in bone-tendon interface regeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.