Literature DB >> 19051246

Remodeling of murine intrasynovial tendon adhesions following injury: MMP and neotendon gene expression.

Alayna E Loiselle1, Gwynne A Bragdon, Justin A Jacobson, Sys Hasslund, Zenia E Cortes, Edward M Schwarz, David J Mitten, Hani A Awad, Regis J O'Keefe.   

Abstract

Tendon injury frequently results in the formation of adhesions that reduce joint range of motion. To study the cellular, molecular, and biomechanical events involved in intrasynovial tendon healing and adhesion formation, we developed a murine flexor tendon healing model in which the flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon of C57BL/6 mice was transected and repaired using suture. This model was used to test the hypothesis that murine flexor tendons heal with differential expression of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), resulting in the formation of scar tissue as well as the subsequent remodeling of scar and adhesions. Healing tendons were evaluated by histology, gene expression via real-time RT-PCR, and in situ hybridization, as well as biomechanical testing to assess the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint flexion range of motion (ROM) and the tensile failure properties. Tendons healed with a highly disorganized fibroblastic tissue response that was progressively remodeled through day 35 resulting in a more organized pattern of collagen fibers. Initial repair involved elevated levels of Mmp-9 at day 7, which is associated with catabolism of damaged collagen fibers. High levels of Col3 are consistent with scar tissue, and gradually transition to the expression of Col1. Scleraxis expression peaked at day 7, but the expression was limited to the original tendon adjacent to the injury site, and no expression was present in granulation tissue involved in the repair response. The MTP joint ROM with standardized force on the tendon was decreased on days 14 and 21 compared to day 0, indicating the presence of adhesions. Peak expressions of Mmp-2 and Mmp-14 were observed at day 21, associated with tendon remodeling. At day 28, two genes associated with neotendon formation, Smad8 and Gdf-5, were elevated and an improvement in MTP ROM occurred. Tensile strength of the tendon progressively increased, but by 63 days the repaired tendons had not reached the tensile strength of normal tendon. The murine model of primary tendon repair, described here, provides a novel mechanism to study the tendon healing process, and further enhances the understanding of this process at the molecular, cellular, and biomechanical level. Copyright 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19051246      PMCID: PMC4472455          DOI: 10.1002/jor.20769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  29 in total

1.  Flexor Tendon Injuries: I. Foundations of Treatment.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Animal models of tendon and ligament injuries for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  J E Carpenter; S Thomopoulos; L J Soslowsky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Tendon healing within the flexor digital sheath in the dog.

Authors:  A D POTENZA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Intrinsic healing of the laceration site in human superficialis flexor tendons in vitro.

Authors:  D P Mass; R J Tuel
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  The excursion and deformation of repaired flexor tendons treated with protected early motion.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; M J Botte; J J Spiegelman; W H Akeson
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Intrinsic tendon healing. A new experimental model.

Authors:  G Lundborg; F Rank; B Heinau
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1985

Review 7.  Complications after treatment of flexor tendon injuries.

Authors:  Soma I Lilly; Terry M Messer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Effects of early intermittent passive mobilization on healing canine flexor tendons.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; S L Woo; K Lothringer; W H Akeson; D Amiel
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Effect of TGF-beta inducible early gene deficiency on flexor tendon healing.

Authors:  Tetsu Tsubone; Steven L Moran; M Subramaniam; P C Amadio; T C Spelsberg; K N An
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Freeze-dried tendon allografts as tissue-engineering scaffolds for Gdf5 gene delivery.

Authors:  Patrick Basile; Tulin Dadali; Justin Jacobson; Sys Hasslund; Michael Ulrich-Vinther; Kjeld Søballe; Yasuhiko Nishio; M Hicham Drissi; Howard N Langstein; David J Mitten; Regis J O'Keefe; Edward M Schwarz; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 11.454

View more
  42 in total

1.  Recent Scientific Advances Towards the Development of Tendon Healing Strategies.

Authors:  Eli T Sayegh; John D Sandy; Mandeep S Virk; Anthony A Romeo; Robert W Wysocki; Jorge O Galante; Katie J Trella; Anna Plaas; Vincent M Wang
Journal:  Curr Tissue Eng       Date:  2015

2.  Non-Invasive Ultrasound Quantification of Scar Tissue Volume Identifies Early Functional Changes During Tendon Healing.

Authors:  Jessica E Ackerman; Valentina Studentsova; Marlin Myers; Mark R Buckley; Michael S Richards; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Low-Dose and Short-Duration Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Inhibition Does Not Affect Adhesion Formation during Murine Flexor Tendon Healing.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orner; Michael B Geary; Warren C Hammert; Regis J O'Keefe; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Cell and Biologic-Based Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries.

Authors:  Stephen W Linderman; Richard H Gelberman; Stavros Thomopoulos; Hua Shen
Journal:  Oper Tech Orthop       Date:  2016-09

5.  Parathyroid hormone 1-34 enhances extracellular matrix deposition and organization during flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Richard D Southgate; Youssef M Farhat; Alayna E Loiselle; Warren C Hammert; Hani A Awad; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Development of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technology against Tgf-β signaling to prevent scarring during flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Alayna E Loiselle; Kiminori Yukata; Michael B Geary; Sirish Kondabolu; Shanshan Shi; Jennifer H Jonason; Hani A Awad; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Cellular and molecular factors in flexor tendon repair and adhesions: a histological and gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Subhash C Juneja; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.417

Review 8.  Mechanisms of tendon injury and repair.

Authors:  Stavros Thomopoulos; William C Parks; Daniel B Rifkin; Kathleen A Derwin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  TGF-β1 Suppresses Plasmin and MMP Activity in Flexor Tendon Cells via PAI-1: Implications for Scarless Flexor Tendon Repair.

Authors:  Youssef M Farhat; Alaa A Al-Maliki; Anas Easa; Regis J O'Keefe; Edward M Schwarz; Hani A Awad
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 10.  Flexor Tendon: Development, Healing, Adhesion Formation, and Contributing Growth Factors.

Authors:  Ashley L Titan; Deshka S Foster; James Chang; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.