Literature DB >> 19051008

Appropriateness of early breast cancer management in relation to patient and hospital characteristics: a population based study in Northern Italy.

R Rosato1, C Sacerdote, E Pagano, D Di Cuonzo, I Baldi, R Bordon, A Ponti, O Bertetto, N Segnan, F Merletti, P Vineis, G Ciccone.   

Abstract

Administrative data may provide valuable information for monitoring the quality of care at population level and offer an efficient way of gathering data on individual patterns of care, and also to shed light on inequalities in access to appropriate medical care. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of patient and hospital characteristics in the initial treatment of early breast cancer using administrative data. Incident breast cancer patients were identified from hospital discharge records and linked to the radiotherapy outpatient database during 2000-2004 in the Piedmont region of Northwestern Italy. Women treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT) were compared to those treated with BCS without radiotherapy (BCS w/o RT) or mastectomy using multinomial logistic regression models. Out of 16,022 incident cases, 46.2% received BCS + RT, 20.3% received BCS w/o RT, and 33.5% received a mastectomy. Compared to BCS + RT, the factors associated with BCS w/o RT were: increased age (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.29-1.85, for ages 70-79 vs. <50), being unmarried (1.24; 1.13-1.36), presence of co-morbidities (1.32; 1.10-1.58), being treated at hospitals with low surgical volume (1.31; 1.07-1.60 for hospitals with less than 50 vs. > or =150 interventions/year), and living far from radiotherapy facilities (1.75; 1.39-2.20 for those at a distance of >45 min). These same factors were also associated with mastectomy. During the 5-year period observed, there was a trend of reduced probability of receiving a mastectomy (0.70; 0.56-0.88 for 2004 vs. 2000). The presence or absence of nodal involvement was positively associated with mastectomy (2.28; 1.83-2.85) and negatively associated with BCS w/o RT (0.65; 0.56-0.76). After adjustment for potential confounders, education level did not show any association with the type of treatment. Social and geographical factors, in addition to hospital specialization, should be considered to reduce inappropriateness of care for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19051008     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0252-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

1.  The Value of Repeated Breast Surgery as a Quality Indicator in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Francesca Tamburelli; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Socioeconomic and racial differences in treatment for breast cancer at a low-volume hospital.

Authors:  Amanda L Kong; Tina W F Yen; Liliana E Pezzin; Haiyan Miao; Rodney A Sparapani; Purushottam W Laud; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Inequalities in access to cancer treatment: an analysis of cross-regional patient mobility in Greece.

Authors:  Kostas Athanasakis; Kyriakos Souliotis; Elias-John Kyriopoulos; Evangelia Loukidou; Persefoni Kritikou; John Kyriopoulos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  A statewide controlled trial intervention to reduce use of unproven or ineffective breast cancer care.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Purushottam Laud; Joan Neuner; Tina W F Yen; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Small but significant socioeconomic inequalities in axillary staging and treatment of breast cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M J Aarts; V C Hamelinck; E Bastiaannet; J W W Coebergh; G J Liefers; A C Voogd; M van der Sangen; W J Louwman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  The socioeconomic determinants of cancer.

Authors:  Franco Merletti; Claudia Galassi; Teresa Spadea
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Breast cancer care compared with clinical Guidelines: an observational study in France.

Authors:  Marie Lebeau; Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier; Carine Bellera; Christine Tunon-de-Lara; Alain Daban; Francis Lipinski; Dominique Jaubert; Pierre Ingrand; Virginie Migeot
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Validity of ICD-9-CM codes for breast, lung and colorectal cancers in three Italian administrative healthcare databases: a diagnostic accuracy study protocol.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Diego Serraino; Gianni Giovannini; Fabrizio Stracci; Paola Casucci; Giuliana Alessandrini; Ettore Bidoli; Rita Chiari; Roberto Cirocchi; Marcello De Giorgi; David Franchini; Maria Francesca Vitale; Mario Fusco; Alessandro Montedori
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Compliance with clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer treatment: a population-based study of quality-of-care indicators in Italy.

Authors:  Carlotta Sacerdote; Rita Bordon; Sabina Pitarella; Maria Piera Mano; Ileana Baldi; Denise Casella; Daniela Di Cuonzo; Alfonso Frigerio; Luisella Milanesio; Franco Merletti; Eva Pagano; Fulvio Ricceri; Stefano Rosso; Nereo Segnan; Mariano Tomatis; Giovannino Ciccone; Paolo Vineis; Antonio Ponti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Provision of breast cancer care and survival in Germany - results from a population-based high resolution study from Saarland.

Authors:  Bernd Holleczek; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.