Literature DB >> 19050946

Flexible cue use in food-caching birds.

Lara D LaDage1, Timothy C Roth, Rebecca A Fox, Vladimir V Pravosudov.   

Abstract

An animal's memory may be limited in capacity, which may result in competition among available memory cues. If such competition exists, natural selection may favor prioritization of different memory cues based on cue reliability and on associated differences in the environment and life history. Food-caching birds store numerous food items and appear to rely on memory to retrieve caches. Previous studies suggested that caching species should always prioritize spatial cues over non-spatial cues when both are available, because non-spatial cues may be unreliable in a changing environment; however, it remains unclear whether non-spatial cues should always be ignored when spatial cues are available. We tested whether mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli), a food-caching species, prioritize memory for spatial cues over color cues when relocating previously found food in an associative learning task. In training trials, birds were exposed to food in a feeder where both spatial location and color were associated. During subsequent unrewarded test trials, color was dissociated from spatial location. Chickadees showed a significant pattern of inspecting feeders associated with correct color first, prior to visiting correct spatial locations. Our findings argue against the hypothesis that the memory of spatial cues should always take priority over any non-spatial cues, including color cues, in food-caching species, because in our experiment mountain chickadees chose color over spatial cues. Our results thus suggest that caching species may be more flexible in cue use than previously thought, possibly dependent upon the environment and complexity of available cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19050946     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-008-0201-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  7 in total

1.  Integrating ecology, psychology and neurobiology within a food-hoarding paradigm.

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Tom V Smulders
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  What scatter-hoarding animals have taught us about small-scale navigation.

Authors:  Kristy L Gould; Debbie M Kelly; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Is bigger always better? A critical appraisal of the use of volumetric analysis in the study of the hippocampus.

Authors:  Timothy C Roth; Anders Brodin; Tom V Smulders; Lara D LaDage; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sex differences in the use of spatial cues in two avian brood parasites.

Authors:  Jimena Lois-Milevicich; Alex Kacelnik; Juan Carlos Reboreda
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  What's in a context? Cautions, limitations, and potential paths forward.

Authors:  Shauna M Stark; Zachariah M Reagh; Michael A Yassa; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Space, feature, and risk sensitivity in homing pigeons (Columba livia): Broadening the conversation on the role of the avian hippocampus in memory.

Authors:  Brittany A Sizemore; Amanda Bausher; Elizabeth Paul; Melissa Russell; Verner P Bingman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Spatial orientation in Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica).

Authors:  Tim Ruploh; Agnieszka Kazek; Hans-Joachim Bischof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.