OBJECTIVE: PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P/F) is the marker of hypoxemia used in the American-European Consensus Conference on lung injury. A high FIO2 level has been reported to variably alter PaO2/FIO2. We investigated the effect of high FIO2 levels on the course of P/F in lung protective mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, interventional study. SETTING: University teaching French medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome having P/F between 100 and 200 mm Hg at FIO2 0.5 received low-volume controlled ventilation (V(T) = 6 mL/kg predicted body weight) with a positive end-expiratory pressure at 2 cm H2O above the lower inflection point if present, or 10 cm H2O. INTERVENTION: The following FIO2 levels were applied randomly for 20 mins: 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Increasing FIO2 above 0.7 was associated with a significant increase in P/F (p < 0.001). The mean P/F change between FIO2 0.5 and 1 (Delta P/F) was 47% +/- 35%. Sixteen patients (67%) had a P/F >200 at FIO2 1 whereas P/F was <200 at FIO2 0.5. Venous admixture (Q(VA)/Q(T)) decreased linearly for each FIO2 step (p < 0.001). The Q(VA)/Q(T) change between FIO2 0.5 and 1 was strongly correlated with Delta P/F (r = 0.84). Delta P/F was higher in patients with true shunt <30% (64% [54-93]) than in those with shunt >30% (20% [10-36]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The P/F ratio increased significantly with a FIO2 >0.7. P/F variation, induced by a switch from FIO2 0.5 to 1, was responsible for two thirds of patients changing from the acute respiratory distress syndrome to the acute lung injury stage of the American-European Consensus Conference definition. FIO2 should be carefully defined for the screening of lung-injured patients.
OBJECTIVE:PaO2/FIO2 ratio (P/F) is the marker of hypoxemia used in the American-European Consensus Conference on lung injury. A high FIO2 level has been reported to variably alter PaO2/FIO2. We investigated the effect of high FIO2 levels on the course of P/F in lung protective mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled, interventional study. SETTING: University teaching French medical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Twenty-four patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome having P/F between 100 and 200 mm Hg at FIO2 0.5 received low-volume controlled ventilation (V(T) = 6 mL/kg predicted body weight) with a positive end-expiratory pressure at 2 cm H2O above the lower inflection point if present, or 10 cm H2O. INTERVENTION: The following FIO2 levels were applied randomly for 20 mins: 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Increasing FIO2 above 0.7 was associated with a significant increase in P/F (p < 0.001). The mean P/F change between FIO2 0.5 and 1 (Delta P/F) was 47% +/- 35%. Sixteen patients (67%) had a P/F >200 at FIO2 1 whereas P/F was <200 at FIO2 0.5. Venous admixture (Q(VA)/Q(T)) decreased linearly for each FIO2 step (p < 0.001). The Q(VA)/Q(T) change between FIO2 0.5 and 1 was strongly correlated with Delta P/F (r = 0.84). Delta P/F was higher in patients with true shunt <30% (64% [54-93]) than in those with shunt >30% (20% [10-36]; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The P/F ratio increased significantly with a FIO2 >0.7. P/F variation, induced by a switch from FIO2 0.5 to 1, was responsible for two thirds of patients changing from the acute respiratory distress syndrome to the acute lung injury stage of the American-European Consensus Conference definition. FIO2 should be carefully defined for the screening of lung-injured patients.
Authors: Giora Netzer; David W Dowdy; Thelma Harrington; Satish Chandolu; Victor D Dinglas; Nirav G Shah; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Carl Shanholtz; Jeffrey D Hasday; Dale M Needham Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2013-12
Authors: Dharmvir S Jaswal; Janice M Leung; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Yan Li; Steven Kern; Judith Welsh; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Martin Britos; Elizabeth Smoot; Kathleen D Liu; B Taylor Thompson; William Checkley; Roy G Brower Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Thomas Namdar; Peter Leonard Stollwerck; Felix Hagen Stang; Karl-Friedrich Klotz; Thomas Lange; Peter Mailänder; Frank Siemers Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2010-06-07
Authors: Pratik Sinha; Carolyn S Calfee; Jeremy R Beitler; Neil Soni; Kelly Ho; Michael A Matthay; Richard H Kallet Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Luigi Pisani; Jan-Paul Roozeman; Fabienne D Simonis; Antonio Giangregorio; Sophia M van der Hoeven; Laura R Schouten; Janneke Horn; Ary Serpa Neto; Emir Festic; Arjen M Dondorp; Salvatore Grasso; Lieuwe D Bos; Marcus J Schultz Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2017-10-25 Impact factor: 6.925