S Wueest1, R A Rapold, J M Rytka, E J Schoenle, D Konrad. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Adipocytes in obesity are characterised by increased cell size and insulin resistance compared with adipocytes isolated from lean patients. However, it is not clear at present whether hypertrophy actually does drive adipocyte insulin resistance. Thus, the aim of the present study was to metabolically characterise small and large adipocytes isolated from epididymal fat pads of mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). METHODS: C57BL/6J mice were fed normal chow or HFD for 8 weeks. Adipocytes from epididymal fat pads were isolated by collagenase digestion and, in HFD-fed mice, separated into two fractions according to their size by filtration through a nylon mesh. Viability was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium assays. Basal and insulin-stimulated D-[U-(14)C]glucose incorporation and lipolysis were measured. Protein levels and mRNA expression were determined by western blot and real-time RT-PCR, respectively. RESULTS: Insulin-stimulated D-[U-(14)C]glucose incorporation into adipocytes isolated from HFD-fed mice was reduced by 50% compared with adipocytes from chow-fed mice. However, it was similar between small (average diameter 60.9 +/- 3.1 microm) and large (average diameter 83.0 +/- 6.6 microm) adipocytes. Similarly, insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of protein kinase B and AS160 were reduced to the same extent in small and large adipocytes isolated from HFD-mice. In addition, insulin failed to inhibit lipolysis in both adipocyte fractions, whereas it decreased lipolysis by 30% in adipocytes of chow-fed mice. In contrast, large and small adipocytes differed in basal lipolysis rate, which was twofold higher in the larger cells. The latter finding was associated with higher mRNA expression levels of Atgl (also known as Pnpla2) and Hsl (also known as Lipe) in larger adipocytes. Viability was not different between small and large adipocytes. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Rate of basal lipolysis but not insulin responsiveness is different between small and large adipocytes isolated from epididymal fat pads of HFD-fed mice.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Adipocytes in obesity are characterised by increased cell size and insulin resistance compared with adipocytes isolated from lean patients. However, it is not clear at present whether hypertrophy actually does drive adipocyte insulin resistance. Thus, the aim of the present study was to metabolically characterise small and large adipocytes isolated from epididymal fat pads of mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). METHODS: C57BL/6J mice were fed normal chow or HFD for 8 weeks. Adipocytes from epididymal fat pads were isolated by collagenase digestion and, in HFD-fed mice, separated into two fractions according to their size by filtration through a nylon mesh. Viability was assessed by lactate dehydrogenase and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium assays. Basal and insulin-stimulated D-[U-(14)C]glucose incorporation and lipolysis were measured. Protein levels and mRNA expression were determined by western blot and real-time RT-PCR, respectively. RESULTS:Insulin-stimulated D-[U-(14)C]glucose incorporation into adipocytes isolated from HFD-fed mice was reduced by 50% compared with adipocytes from chow-fed mice. However, it was similar between small (average diameter 60.9 +/- 3.1 microm) and large (average diameter 83.0 +/- 6.6 microm) adipocytes. Similarly, insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of protein kinase B and AS160 were reduced to the same extent in small and large adipocytes isolated from HFD-mice. In addition, insulin failed to inhibit lipolysis in both adipocyte fractions, whereas it decreased lipolysis by 30% in adipocytes of chow-fed mice. In contrast, large and small adipocytes differed in basal lipolysis rate, which was twofold higher in the larger cells. The latter finding was associated with higher mRNA expression levels of Atgl (also known as Pnpla2) and Hsl (also known as Lipe) in larger adipocytes. Viability was not different between small and large adipocytes. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Rate of basal lipolysis but not insulin responsiveness is different between small and large adipocytes isolated from epididymal fat pads of HFD-fed mice.
Authors: Sandra C Souza; Kizito V Muliro; Laura Liscum; Ping Lien; Mia T Yamamoto; Jean E Schaffer; Gerard E Dallal; Xinzhong Wang; Fredric B Kraemer; Martin Obin; Andrew S Greenberg Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2001-12-20 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A Okuno; H Tamemoto; K Tobe; K Ueki; Y Mori; K Iwamoto; K Umesono; Y Akanuma; T Fujiwara; H Horikoshi; Y Yazaki; T Kadowaki Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-03-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: A Rudich; D Konrad; D Török; R Ben-Romano; C Huang; W Niu; R R Garg; N Wijesekara; R J Germinario; P J Bilan; A Klip Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2003-04-24 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Katherine J Strissel; Zlatina Stancheva; Hideaki Miyoshi; James W Perfield; Jason DeFuria; Zoe Jick; Andrew S Greenberg; Martin S Obin Journal: Diabetes Date: 2007-09-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Alexis Cutchins; Daniel B Harmon; Jennifer L Kirby; Amanda C Doran; Stephanie N Oldham; Marcus Skaflen; Alexander L Klibanov; Nahum Meller; Susanna R Keller; James Garmey; Coleen A McNamara Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Oleg Varlamov; Romel Somwar; Anda Cornea; Paul Kievit; Kevin L Grove; Charles T Roberts Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Morvarid Kabir; Darko Stefanovski; Isabel R Hsu; Malini Iyer; Orison O Woolcott; Dan Zheng; Karyn J Catalano; Jenny D Chiu; Stella P Kim; Lisa N Harrison; Viorica Ionut; Maya Lottati; Richard N Bergman; Joyce M Richey Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Stephan Wueest; Reto A Rapold; Desiree M Schumann; Julia M Rytka; Anita Schildknecht; Ori Nov; Alexander V Chervonsky; Assaf Rudich; Eugen J Schoenle; Marc Y Donath; Daniel Konrad Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 14.808