D Konrad1, A Rudich, E J Schoenle. 1. Department of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Children's Hospital, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland. daniel.konrad@kispi.unizh.ch
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The association between increased (visceral) fat mass, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus is well known. Yet, it is unclear whether the mere increase in intra-abdominal fat mass, or rather functional alterations in fat tissue in obesity contribute to the development of insulin resistance in obese patients. Here we attempted to isolate the metabolic effect of increased fat mass by fat tissue transplantation. METHODS: Epididymal fat pads were removed from male C57Bl6/J mice and transplanted intraperitoneally into male littermates (recipients), increasing the combined perigonadal fat mass by 50% (p < 0.005). At 4 and 8 weeks post-transplantation, glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed, and insulin, NEFA and adipokines measured. RESULTS: Circulating levels of NEFA, adiponectin and leptin were not significantly different between transplanted and sham-operated control mice, while results of the postprandial insulin tolerance test were similar between the two groups. In contrast, under fasting conditions, the mere increase in intra-abdominal fat mass resulted in decreased plasma glucose levels (6.9 +/- 0.4 vs 8.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, p = 0.03) and a approximately 20% lower AUC in the glucose tolerance test (p = 0.02) in transplanted mice. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was 4.1 +/- 0.4 in transplanted mice (vs 6.2 +/- 0.7 in sham-operated controls) (p = 0.02), suggesting improved insulin sensitivity. Linear regression modelling revealed that while total body weight positively correlated, as expected, with HOMA-IR (beta: 0.728, p = 0.006), higher transplanted fat mass correlated with lower HOMA-IR (beta: -0.505, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Increasing intra-abdominal fat mass by transplantation of fat from normal mice improved, rather than impaired, fasting glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, achieving an effect opposite to the expected metabolic consequence of increased visceral fat in obesity.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The association between increased (visceral) fat mass, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus is well known. Yet, it is unclear whether the mere increase in intra-abdominal fat mass, or rather functional alterations in fat tissue in obesity contribute to the development of insulin resistance in obesepatients. Here we attempted to isolate the metabolic effect of increased fat mass by fat tissue transplantation. METHODS: Epididymal fat pads were removed from male C57Bl6/J mice and transplanted intraperitoneally into male littermates (recipients), increasing the combined perigonadal fat mass by 50% (p < 0.005). At 4 and 8 weeks post-transplantation, glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed, and insulin, NEFA and adipokines measured. RESULTS: Circulating levels of NEFA, adiponectin and leptin were not significantly different between transplanted and sham-operated control mice, while results of the postprandial insulin tolerance test were similar between the two groups. In contrast, under fasting conditions, the mere increase in intra-abdominal fat mass resulted in decreased plasma glucose levels (6.9 +/- 0.4 vs 8.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, p = 0.03) and a approximately 20% lower AUC in the glucose tolerance test (p = 0.02) in transplanted mice. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was 4.1 +/- 0.4 in transplanted mice (vs 6.2 +/- 0.7 in sham-operated controls) (p = 0.02), suggesting improved insulin sensitivity. Linear regression modelling revealed that while total body weight positively correlated, as expected, with HOMA-IR (beta: 0.728, p = 0.006), higher transplanted fat mass correlated with lower HOMA-IR (beta: -0.505, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Increasing intra-abdominal fat mass by transplantation of fat from normal mice improved, rather than impaired, fasting glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, achieving an effect opposite to the expected metabolic consequence of increased visceral fat in obesity.
Authors: A Okuno; H Tamemoto; K Tobe; K Ueki; Y Mori; K Iwamoto; K Umesono; Y Akanuma; T Fujiwara; H Horikoshi; Y Yazaki; T Kadowaki Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-03-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Oleg Varlamov; Romel Somwar; Anda Cornea; Paul Kievit; Kevin L Grove; Charles T Roberts Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-06-22 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Stephan Wueest; Xingyuan Yang; Jun Liu; Eugen J Schoenle; Daniel Konrad Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Stephan Wueest; Reto A Rapold; Desiree M Schumann; Julia M Rytka; Anita Schildknecht; Ori Nov; Alexander V Chervonsky; Assaf Rudich; Eugen J Schoenle; Marc Y Donath; Daniel Konrad Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2009-12-01 Impact factor: 14.808