BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosis and undertreatment of depression in older, long-term unemployed people may not only pose a serious medical problem, but may also be an obstacle for their vocational reintegration. Screening for depression could be a first step to increasing treatment rates within this high-risk group. Therefore, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index was tested for its validity in unemployment offices. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred and sixty-five participants in a German programme for the vocational reintegration of long-term unemployed people were screened with the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. In 104 of these subjects, ICD-10 diagnoses were made using DIA-X Structured Clinical Interview. RESULTS: Using the DIA-X data as a gold standard, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index obtained satisfactory results for sensitivity (82.5%) and specificity (70.3%) as a screening tool for affective disorders when used with an adjusted cut-off-point of < or = 12. While none of the 18.5% male participants diagnosed with major depression received treatment, half of the 24% of female participants with major depression received treatment. CONCLUSION: Screening with the WHO-5 within unemployment offices is useful to detect people with depressive disorders. Many of them do not receive optimal treatment and can be motivated to seek professional help. Reducing depression by better treatment will also increase the chances of reemployment.
BACKGROUND: Misdiagnosis and undertreatment of depression in older, long-term unemployed people may not only pose a serious medical problem, but may also be an obstacle for their vocational reintegration. Screening for depression could be a first step to increasing treatment rates within this high-risk group. Therefore, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index was tested for its validity in unemployment offices. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred and sixty-five participants in a German programme for the vocational reintegration of long-term unemployed people were screened with the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. In 104 of these subjects, ICD-10 diagnoses were made using DIA-X Structured Clinical Interview. RESULTS: Using the DIA-X data as a gold standard, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index obtained satisfactory results for sensitivity (82.5%) and specificity (70.3%) as a screening tool for affective disorders when used with an adjusted cut-off-point of < or = 12. While none of the 18.5% male participants diagnosed with major depression received treatment, half of the 24% of female participants with major depression received treatment. CONCLUSION: Screening with the WHO-5 within unemployment offices is useful to detect people with depressive disorders. Many of them do not receive optimal treatment and can be motivated to seek professional help. Reducing depression by better treatment will also increase the chances of reemployment.
Authors: Juha Hämäläinen; Kari Poikolainen; Erkki Isometsä; Jaakko Kaprio; Martti Heikkinen; Sari Lindeman; Hillevi Aro Journal: Nord J Psychiatry Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.202
Authors: John W Williams; Michael Pignone; Gilbert Ramirez; Christina Perez Stellato Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Ottar Bjerkeset; Hans M Nordahl; Sara Larsson; Alv A Dahl; Olav Linaker Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2007-12-06 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: V Reissner; N Scherbaum; J Wiltfang; B Kis; B Meiler; B Lieb; T Mikoteit; G Ehren; J Hebebrand Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 1.214
Authors: Oliver Gruebner; Md Mobarak H Khan; Sven Lautenbach; Daniel Müller; Alexander Kraemer; Tobia Lakes; Patrick Hostert Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2011-05-20 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Oliver Gruebner; M Mobarak H Khan; Sven Lautenbach; Daniel Müller; Alexander Krämer; Tobia Lakes; Patrick Hostert Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Heribert Limm; Mechthild Heinmüller; Harald Gündel; Katrin Liel; Karin Seeger; Ramazan Salman; Peter Angerer Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.411