Literature DB >> 19047423

A delicate balance: integrating active learning into a large lecture course.

J D Walker1, Sehoya H Cotner, Paul M Baepler, Mark D Decker.   

Abstract

A lecture section of introductory biology that historically enrolled more than 500 students was split into two smaller sections of approximately 250 students each. A traditional lecture format was followed in the "traditional" section; lecture time in the "active" section was drastically reduced in favor of a variety of in-class student-centered activities. Students in both sections took unannounced quizzes and multiple-choice exams. Evaluation consisted of comparisons of student survey responses, scores on standardized teaching evaluation forms, section averages and attendance, and open-ended student comments on end-of-term surveys. Results demonstrate that students perform as well, if not better, in an active versus traditional environment. However, student concerns about instructor expectations indicate that a judicious balance of student-centered activities and presentation-style instruction may be the best approach.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19047423      PMCID: PMC2592041          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.08-02-0004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  5 in total

1.  Science education: spare me the lecture.

Authors:  Kendall Powell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

4.  Cooperative learning in industrial-sized biology classes.

Authors:  Norris Armstrong; Shu-Mei Chang; Marguerite Brickman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Scott Freeman; Eileen O'Connor; John W Parks; Matthew Cunningham; David Hurley; David Haak; Clarissa Dirks; Mary Pat Wenderoth
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

  5 in total
  31 in total

1.  Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning.

Authors:  Ralph W Preszler
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Peter Armbruster; Maya Patel; Erika Johnson; Martha Weiss
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Impact of abbreviated lecture with interactive mini-cases vs traditional lecture on student performance in the large classroom.

Authors:  Leisa L Marshall; Diane L Nykamp; Kathryn M Momary
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Don't Believe the Gripe! Increasing Course Structure in a Large Non-majors Neuroscience Course.

Authors:  Anastasia Nagel; Andrea Nicholas
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-06-15

5.  Authentic active learning activities demonstrating the use of serial dilutions and plate counts.

Authors:  Jordon K March; Kyle C Jensen; Nathan T Porter; Donald P Breakwell
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2011-12-01

6.  Test-Enhanced Learning in an Immunology and Infectious Disease Medicinal Chemistry/Pharmacology Course.

Authors:  Marcy Hernick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction?

Authors:  Kathryn E Perez; Eric A Strauss; Nicholas Downey; Anne Galbraith; Robert Jeanne; Scott Cooper
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions.

Authors:  M K Smith; W B Wood; K Krauter; J K Knight
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.

Authors:  Hayley Leight; Cheston Saunders; Robin Calkins; Michelle Withers
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Context dependence of students' views about the role of equations in understanding biology.

Authors:  Jessica Watkins; Andrew Elby
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.