Literature DB >> 19046276

Corneal innervation in mesocephalic and brachycephalic dogs and cats: assessment using in vivo confocal microscopy.

Christiane Kafarnik1, Jens Fritsche, Sven Reese.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the density of the canine and feline corneal neural network in healthy dogs and cats using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). ANIMALS EXAMINED: A total of 16 adult dogs (9 Mesocephalic breeds, 7 Brachycephalic breeds) and 15 cats (9 Domestic Short-haired cats (DSH), 6 Persian cats) underwent IVCM. PROCEDURE: Animals were examined with a confocal corneal microscope (HRTII/RCM; Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II/Rostock Cornea Module, Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany). The investigations focused on the distribution of the corneal nerves and quantification of central subepithelial and subbasal nerve plexus.
RESULTS: The corneal stromal nerve trunks, subepithelial and subbasal nerve plexus were observed. The nerve fiber density (NFD) quantified in nerve fiber length in mesocephalic dogs were 12.39 +/- 5.25 mm/mm(2) in the subepithelial nerve plexus and 14.87 +/- 3.08 mm/mm(2) in the subbasal nerve plexus. The NFD of the subepithelial nerve plexus in DSH cats was 15.49 +/- 2.7 and 18.4 +/- 3.84 mm/mm(2) in the subbasal nerve plexus. The subbasal NFD of DSH cats was significantly higher than in mesocephalic dogs (P = 0.037). The subepithelial NFD in brachycephalic dogs, and Persian cats were 10.34 +/- 4.71 and 9.50 +/- 2.3 mm/mm(2), respectively. The subbasal NFD measured 11.80 +/- 3.73 mm/mm(2) in brachycephalic dogs, and 12.28 +/- 4.3 mm/mm(2) NFD in Persian cats, respectively. The subepithelial and subbasal NFD in Persian cats were significantly lower than in DSH cats (P = 0.028, respectively, P = 0.031), in contrast to brachycephalic vs. mesocephalic dogs.
CONCLUSION: The noninvasive IVCM accurately detects corneal innervation and provides a reliable quantification of central corneal nerves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19046276     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2008.00659.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1463-5216            Impact factor:   1.644


  9 in total

1.  In vivo ocular imaging of the cornea of the normal female laboratory beagle using confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.644

2.  Relationship between corneal sensitivity, corneal thickness, corneal diameter, and intraocular pressure in normal cats and cats with congenital glaucoma.

Authors:  Mary R Telle; Nickolas Chen; Daniel Shinsako; Julie A Kiland; Kazuya Oikawa; Ralph Møller Trane; Gillian J McLellan
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.644

3.  Repeated monitoring of corneal nerves by confocal microscopy as an index of peripheral neuropathy in type-1 diabetic rodents and the effects of topical insulin.

Authors:  Debbie K Chen; Katie E Frizzi; Lucie S Guernsey; Kelsey Ladt; Andrew P Mizisin; Nigel A Calcutt
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Development of a novel in vivo corneal fibrosis model in the dog.

Authors:  K M Gronkiewicz; E A Giuliano; K Kuroki; F Bunyak; A Sharma; L B C Teixeira; C W Hamm; R R Mohan
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  In the Eye of the Beholder: Owner Preferences for Variations in Cats' Appearances with Specific Focus on Skull Morphology.

Authors:  Mark J Farnworth; Rowena M A Packer; Lorena Sordo; Ruoning Chen; Sarah M A Caney; Danièlle A Gunn-Moore
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Persian cats under first opinion veterinary care in the UK: demography, mortality and disorders.

Authors:  Dan G O'Neill; Charlotte Romans; Dave C Brodbelt; David B Church; Petra Černá; Danièlle A Gunn-Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Modelling Neurological Diseases in Large Animals: Criteria for Model Selection and Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Samantha L Eaton; Fraser Murdoch; Nina M Rzechorzek; Gerard Thompson; Claudia Hartley; Benjamin Thomas Blacklock; Chris Proudfoot; Simon G Lillico; Peter Tennant; Adrian Ritchie; James Nixon; Paul M Brennan; Stefano Guido; Nadia L Mitchell; David N Palmer; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Jonathan D Cooper; Thomas M Wishart
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 8.  New Paradigms for the Study of Ocular Alphaherpesvirus Infections: Insights into the Use of Non-Traditional Host Model Systems.

Authors:  Matthew R Pennington; Eric C Ledbetter; Gerlinde R Van de Walle
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Comparative Anatomy of the Mammalian Corneal Subbasal Nerve Plexus.

Authors:  Carl Marfurt; Miracle C Anokwute; Kaleigh Fetcko; Erin Mahony-Perez; Hassan Farooq; Emily Ross; Maraya M Baumanis; Rachel L Weinberg; Megan E McCarron; Joseph L Mankowski
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.