OBJECTIVE: To determine the density of the canine and feline corneal neural network in healthy dogs and cats using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). ANIMALS EXAMINED: A total of 16 adult dogs (9 Mesocephalic breeds, 7 Brachycephalic breeds) and 15 cats (9 Domestic Short-haired cats (DSH), 6 Persian cats) underwent IVCM. PROCEDURE: Animals were examined with a confocal corneal microscope (HRTII/RCM; Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II/Rostock Cornea Module, Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany). The investigations focused on the distribution of the corneal nerves and quantification of central subepithelial and subbasal nerve plexus. RESULTS: The corneal stromal nerve trunks, subepithelial and subbasal nerve plexus were observed. The nerve fiber density (NFD) quantified in nerve fiber length in mesocephalic dogs were 12.39 +/- 5.25 mm/mm(2) in the subepithelial nerve plexus and 14.87 +/- 3.08 mm/mm(2) in the subbasal nerve plexus. The NFD of the subepithelial nerve plexus in DSH cats was 15.49 +/- 2.7 and 18.4 +/- 3.84 mm/mm(2) in the subbasal nerve plexus. The subbasal NFD of DSH cats was significantly higher than in mesocephalic dogs (P = 0.037). The subepithelial NFD in brachycephalic dogs, and Persian cats were 10.34 +/- 4.71 and 9.50 +/- 2.3 mm/mm(2), respectively. The subbasal NFD measured 11.80 +/- 3.73 mm/mm(2) in brachycephalic dogs, and 12.28 +/- 4.3 mm/mm(2) NFD in Persian cats, respectively. The subepithelial and subbasal NFD in Persian cats were significantly lower than in DSH cats (P = 0.028, respectively, P = 0.031), in contrast to brachycephalic vs. mesocephalic dogs. CONCLUSION: The noninvasive IVCM accurately detects corneal innervation and provides a reliable quantification of central corneal nerves.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the density of the canine and feline corneal neural network in healthy dogs and cats using in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). ANIMALS EXAMINED: A total of 16 adult dogs (9 Mesocephalic breeds, 7 Brachycephalic breeds) and 15 cats (9 Domestic Short-haired cats (DSH), 6 Persian cats) underwent IVCM. PROCEDURE: Animals were examined with a confocal corneal microscope (HRTII/RCM; Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II/Rostock Cornea Module, Heidelberg Engineering, Dossenheim, Germany). The investigations focused on the distribution of the corneal nerves and quantification of central subepithelial and subbasal nerve plexus. RESULTS: The corneal stromal nerve trunks, subepithelial and subbasal nerve plexus were observed. The nerve fiber density (NFD) quantified in nerve fiber length in mesocephalic dogs were 12.39 +/- 5.25 mm/mm(2) in the subepithelial nerve plexus and 14.87 +/- 3.08 mm/mm(2) in the subbasal nerve plexus. The NFD of the subepithelial nerve plexus in DSH cats was 15.49 +/- 2.7 and 18.4 +/- 3.84 mm/mm(2) in the subbasal nerve plexus. The subbasal NFD of DSH cats was significantly higher than in mesocephalic dogs (P = 0.037). The subepithelial NFD in brachycephalic dogs, and Persian cats were 10.34 +/- 4.71 and 9.50 +/- 2.3 mm/mm(2), respectively. The subbasal NFD measured 11.80 +/- 3.73 mm/mm(2) in brachycephalic dogs, and 12.28 +/- 4.3 mm/mm(2) NFD in Persian cats, respectively. The subepithelial and subbasal NFD in Persian cats were significantly lower than in DSH cats (P = 0.028, respectively, P = 0.031), in contrast to brachycephalic vs. mesocephalic dogs. CONCLUSION: The noninvasive IVCM accurately detects corneal innervation and provides a reliable quantification of central corneal nerves.
Authors: Ann R Strom; Dennis E Cortés; Sara M Thomasy; Philip H Kass; Mark J Mannis; Christopher J Murphy Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Mary R Telle; Nickolas Chen; Daniel Shinsako; Julie A Kiland; Kazuya Oikawa; Ralph Møller Trane; Gillian J McLellan Journal: Vet Ophthalmol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 1.644
Authors: Debbie K Chen; Katie E Frizzi; Lucie S Guernsey; Kelsey Ladt; Andrew P Mizisin; Nigel A Calcutt Journal: J Peripher Nerv Syst Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: K M Gronkiewicz; E A Giuliano; K Kuroki; F Bunyak; A Sharma; L B C Teixeira; C W Hamm; R R Mohan Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Mark J Farnworth; Rowena M A Packer; Lorena Sordo; Ruoning Chen; Sarah M A Caney; Danièlle A Gunn-Moore Journal: Animals (Basel) Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 2.752
Authors: Dan G O'Neill; Charlotte Romans; Dave C Brodbelt; David B Church; Petra Černá; Danièlle A Gunn-Moore Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Samantha L Eaton; Fraser Murdoch; Nina M Rzechorzek; Gerard Thompson; Claudia Hartley; Benjamin Thomas Blacklock; Chris Proudfoot; Simon G Lillico; Peter Tennant; Adrian Ritchie; James Nixon; Paul M Brennan; Stefano Guido; Nadia L Mitchell; David N Palmer; C Bruce A Whitelaw; Jonathan D Cooper; Thomas M Wishart Journal: Cells Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 7.666
Authors: Carl Marfurt; Miracle C Anokwute; Kaleigh Fetcko; Erin Mahony-Perez; Hassan Farooq; Emily Ross; Maraya M Baumanis; Rachel L Weinberg; Megan E McCarron; Joseph L Mankowski Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 4.799